Skip to content

· Public charity

Blue Hills Civic Association

BLUE HILLS CIVIC ASSOCIATION empowers the people living and working in the blue hills and surrounding communities to create stable and attractive neighborhoods through organizing, advocacy, and multigenerational programs.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $750k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.3M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PROSPERITY FOUNDATION$1,100,000
SHEBA CONSULTING LLC$600,000
UPPER ALBANY NEIGHBORHOOD COLLABORA$550,000
YWCA HARTFORD REGION INC$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD$250,000
WILSON-GRAY YMCA$250,000
MY PEOPLE CLINICAL SERVICES LLC$200,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
HARTFORD HEALTH INITIATIVE$150,000
GREATER HARTFORD ALLIANCE OF BLACK$100,200
CONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE$100,000
BERKINS FAMILY LLC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HARTFORD KNIGHTS CORP$25,000
WEST INDIAN INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATIO$20,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Indian Social Club of Hartford Inc
—
2
Greater Hartford Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
3
The Hartford Chamber of Commerce Incorporated

To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.

—
4
Hartford Neighborhood Centers

To be an educational, cultural, social and recreational "safe have" of opportunity for the diverse ethnic populations of Greater Hartford

Human Services
5
Hartford Police Union

Represent and protect union members' rights and interests.

—
6
Greater Hartford Twilight Baseball League
Recreation & Sports
7
Hartford Gay and Lesbian Health Collective Inc

The hartford gay & lesbian health collective empowers individuals of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions to lead healthly lives through the provision of health and support services, education and advocacy.

—
8
Greater Hartford Association of Realtors

To unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession for the purpose of exerting a beneficial influence upon the profession and related interest.

—
9
The Hartford County Bar Association Inc

To advance jurisprudence and administration of justice, to uphold and improve the professional and educational standards of the legal profession and provide the public with a lawyer referral service to advance the cause of law.

—
10
The Hartford Guides Inc

To promote and enhance the city of hartford by providing uniformed guides who provide information and assistance to the public in the downtown and other areas of hartford.

—
11
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
12
Hartford City Mission Inc

Reflecting god's love to unlock the potential of hartford's youth, families, and neighborhoods.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Hartford Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Indian Independence Celebrations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHEBA CONSULTING LLC: $600,000 · OtherSHEBA CONSULTING LLCYWCA HARTFORD REGION INC: $500,000 · OtherYWCA HARTFORD REGION INCMY PEOPLE CLINICAL SERVICES LLC: $200,000 · OtherMY PEOPLE CLINICAL SERVICES LLCIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREATER HARTFORD ALLIANCE OF BLACK SOCIAL WORKERS INC: $100,200 · OtherGREATER HARTFORD ALLIANCE OF BLACK SOCIAL WOR…+6 more: $125,000 · Other+6 moreTHE PROSPERITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,100,000 · Human ServicesTHE PROSPERITY FOUNDATION INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MET…CONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC+2 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesUPPER ALBANY NEIGHBORHOOD COLLABORATIVE: $550,000 · Community ImprovementUPPER ALBANY N…UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $250,000 · EducationHartford Health Inititative Inc: $150,000 · HealthHARTFORD KNIGHTS CORP: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHartford Lions Soccer Academy: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentWEST INDIAN INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATIONS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureANGEL OF EDGEWOOD INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,675,200Human Services$1,480,000Community Improvement$550,000Education$250,000Health$150,000Youth Development$35,000Arts & Culture$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PROSPERITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,100,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetUPPER ALBANY NEIGHBORHOOD COLLABORATIVE: $550,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetYWCA HARTFORD REGION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN HARTFORD INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHartford Health Inititative Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetCONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHARTFORD KNIGHTS CORP: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWEST INDIAN INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATIONS: $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetANGEL OF EDGEWOOD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blue Hills Civic Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blue Hills Civic Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Upper Albany Neighborhood Collaborative: 73% of income from government
  • Hartford Knights Corp: 70% of income from government
  • The Prosperity Foundation Inc: 56% of income from government
  • Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Ywca Hartford Region Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Hartford Lions Soccer Academy: 7% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blue Hills Civic Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph