Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blittersdorf Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$996kEnvironment$651kPublic Benefit$345kArts & Culture$165kHuman Services$55kScience & Tech$30kCivil Rights$5kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$157k
Total assets

Largely a single collection: about 94% of reported assets are Gold.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$50,000
ECHO LEAHY CENTER FOR LAKE CHAMPLAIN$30,000
RESOURCE$10,000
PITTSFORD VILLAGE FARM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESOURCE: $20k → 10%RESOURCE: $10k → 10%RESOURCE: $10k → 10%RESOURCE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 13 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$2.0M
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+80%

Still filing today

62%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $475k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $450k · revenue +35%
  • VB
    VERMONT BUSINESSES FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH & EDU FDN
    4× · 2017–2022 · $65k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • VD
    VT DIGGER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • VT
    VERMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
2
Vermont Center for Emerging Technologies Inc

Vcet's purpose is to accelerate innovation and entrepreneurship across vermont. this is accomplished by providing expert mentoring and technical assistance, the operation of coworking/incubation facilities and the operation of early stage…

Community Improvement
3
Vermont Trails & Greenways Council

To promote trails and greenways and to ensure that people will always have access to the landscape of vermont.

Environment
4
Vermont Museum of Natural History Inc

Environmental education through museum exhibits and school, library, and other public programs.

Arts & Culture
5
Vermont Energy Investment Corporation

Veic is a sustainable energy company on a mission to generate the energy solutions the world needs (continues in schedule o). (continued), working to combat the climate crisis, boost community resilience, and lower energy costs. for nearly…

Environment
6
Cooperation Vermont Community Land Trust

The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.

Community Improvement
7
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
8
Gunsensevt

To ensure all vermonters are free from gun violence

Civil Rights
9
Alliance for a Better Vermont

Conducts and coordinates research of critical issues affecting vermonters. also conducts public opinion research.

—
10
Vermont Business Roundtable Inc

To sustain a sound economy and preserve vermont's unique quality of life by studying and making recommendations on statewide public policy issues.

—
11
Vermont Interfaith Power and Light

Vermont interfaith power and light (vtipl) works to help members of vermont's faith and spiritual communities understand that the climate crisis which is threatening the viability of life on earth is a spiritual crisis. vtipl conducts…

—
12
Vermont Land Trust Inc

Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility Research & Edu Fdn; the most unlike its peers is Pittsford Village Farm Dba Pittsford Preservation Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POST CARBON INSTITUTE: $300,000 · OtherPOST CARBON INSTITUTEVT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP - EDUCATIONAL FUND: $230,790 · OtherVT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP - EDUCATIONAL FUN…VPR: $150,000 · OtherVPRLAKE CHAMPLAIN SCIENCE CENTER AT ECHO: $125,000 · OtherLAKE CHAMPLAIN SCIENCE CENTER AT ECHOIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherVT DIGGER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+12 more: $113,000 · Other+12 moreWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $475,000 · EducationWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INCUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLE…VERMONT BUSINESSES FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH & EDU FDN: $65,000 · EducationVERMONT BUSINESSES FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RESEA…+2 more: $9,000 · EducationVERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH & EDUCATION FUND INC: $54,490 · EnvironmentNET ZERO VERMONT INCORPORATED: $40,000 · Environment350 VERMONT INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentLEAHY CENTER FOR LAKE CHAMPLAIN INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureYORK COUNTY HISTORY CENTER: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesPITTSFORD VILLAGE FARM DBA PITTSFORD PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,018,790Education$999,000Environment$124,490Arts & Culture$55,000Human Services$50,000Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $475,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $450,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVERMONT BUSINESSES FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH & EDU FDN: $65,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetVERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH & EDUCATION FUND INC: $54,490 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetRESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLEAHY CENTER FOR LAKE CHAMPLAIN INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget350 VERMONT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetYORK COUNTY HISTORY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVermont International Film Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetVERMONT ENERGY EDUCATION PROGRAM INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSFORD VILLAGE FARM DBA PITTSFORD PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT BUSINESSES FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY RESEARCH & EDU FDN ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAHY CENTER FOR LAKE CHAMPLAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NET ZERO VERMONT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds 350 VERMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY HISTORY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STERLING COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Vermont International Film Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT ENERGY EDUCATION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSFORD VILLAGE FARM DBA PITTSFORD PRESERVATION CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Christina Heroy Foundation · Harris & Frances Block Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blittersdorf Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blittersdorf Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Leahy Center for Lake Champlain Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Net Zero Vermont Incorporated: 33% of income from government
  • Sterling College: 10% of income from government
  • Vermont Energy Education Program Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Resource a Nonprofit Community Enterprise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blittersdorf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph