Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blind Mission Project of Central Illinois

PROVIDING EYE CARE TO UNDERPRIVILEGED PERSONS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$18kInternational$11kEducation$8kYouth Development$4kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$1kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
8
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS CITY UNIV$3,000
ST JUDE'S$2,500
PHYSICIANS MISSION INC$2,500
SMILE TRAIN$2,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,500
STAND WITH UKRAINE$1,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$700
DOVE INC$700
CENTRAL IL FOOD BANK$500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$300
CENTRAL A&M$300
THINKWELL-HOMESCHOOL NETWORK$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%CHRISTIAN COUNTY YMCA: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MO
MD
AZ
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 26 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
10

Total granted

$42k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-15%

Still filing today

42%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    Kansas City University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +2%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IM
    INDIA MISSION TRIP
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • PM
    PHYSICIAN MISSION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
9
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
10
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guiding Eyes for the Blind Inc; the most unlike its peers is Central Illinois Foodbank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIA MISSION TRIP: $6,239 · OtherINDIA MISSION TRIPSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,700 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCPHYSICIANS MISSION INC: $5,000 · OtherPHYSICIANS MISSION INCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICASTAND WITH UKRAINE: $2,000 · OtherSTAND WITH UKRAINEPHYSICIAN MISSION INC: $2,000 · OtherPHYSICIAN MISSION INCDOVE INC: $1,950 · OtherDOVE INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $1,600 · Other+24 more: $8,700 · Other+24 moreKansas City University: $6,250 · EducationKansas City U…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,500 · HealthST JUDE CH…GROWING STRONG SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $400 · HealthGROWING ST…Mercy Ships International: $4,000 · InternationalMercy Shi…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $700 · InternationalMEDECINS …Central Illinois Foodbank Inc: $1,300 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $500 · AnimalsMercy Communities Inc: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$35,189Education$6,250Health$4,900International$4,700Food & Nutrition$1,300Animals$500Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKansas City University: $6,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Illinois Foodbank Inc: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Communities Inc: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING STRONG SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABY TALK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kansas City University ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Central Illinois Foodbank Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Communities Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING STRONG SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BABY TALK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Decatur and Mid IlIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Decatur and Mid Il · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blind Mission Project of Central Illinois funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blind Mission Project of Central Illinois. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blind Mission Project of Central Illinois’ filings →

    More from the funding graph