Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bleu Blanc Rouge Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$980k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$2.0MArts & Culture$936kHousing & Shelter$482kHuman Services$477kHealth$407kEducation$355kYouth Development$291kPhilanthropy$195kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $293k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $612k
$10,300
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Refugee Home Project$195,263
Individual grant recipient$128,740
Carefree Cornwall$96,570
The Big House$64,380
Drive Forward Foundation$63,535
Settle$63,535
The National House Project$32,130
Children and Families Across Borders$31,845
Kazzum Arts Project$31,845
Praxis Community Projects$31,845
We are Juno CIC$31,845
Catch 22$31,845
Fundacion Save the Med$25,816
Electronic Frontier Foundation$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 50% of grant dollars ($3.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 50% that went abroad ($3.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFE HORIZON INC: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
SC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 50% of all-years giving ($3.3M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$3.3M · 69 grants
Ireland$35k · 1 grant
Spain$26k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 30 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
51

Total granted

$4.1M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+11%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    REFUGEE HOME PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $929k · revenue +30% · 51% of their budget
  • NV
    NEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $29k · revenue +0%
  • EF
    Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • ST
    STRONGER THAN EVER
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue -41% · 41% of their budget
  • TO
    THE OLD VIC THEATRE TRUST 2000
    one grant, 2020 · $273k
  • AR
    ABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC
    one grant, 2018 · $168k · revenue -83% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
2
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
3
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
4
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
5
Sharedimpact Foundation

Providing philanthropists, foundations and family offices access to social investment expertise by allowing the donors to give tax deductible donations worldwide through a social investment market.

Philanthropy
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
9
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.

Environment
10
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
11
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
12
Ffwd

FFWD accelerates the growth of technology nonprofits by providing financial and human capital to help scale technology solutions for education, environmental, health, and human rights issues.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ignite; the most unlike its peers is Addiscoder Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/39
Grantees still filing
21/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAREFREE CORNWALL: $359,767 · OtherCAREFREE CORNWALLTHE OLD VIC THEATRE TRUST 2000: $273,276 · OtherTHE OLD VIC THEATRE TRUST 2000Individual grant recipient: $256,052 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BIG HOUSE: $235,178 · OtherA GLIMMER OF HOPE: $200,255 · OtherNEW HORIZON YOUTH CENTRE: $194,031 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $194,031 · OtherABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC: $167,500 · OtherDRIVE FORWARD FOUNDATION: $166,014 · Other+68 more: $2,606,908 · Other+68 moreREFUGEE HOME PROJECT INC: $929,201 · InternationalREFUGEE HOME PROJECT INCSTRONGER THAN EVER: $300,000 · InternationalSTRONGER THAN EVERAmerican School in London Foundation: $107,215 · InternationalAmerican School in Londo…THE INSEAD MANAGEMENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · International+4 more: $45,500 · InternationalWhole Child International: $410,156 · Youth DevelopmentNEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $28,500 · EducationGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $18,187 · EducationAFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,200 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $7,500 · EducationHCAP Aerospace Scholarship Foundation: $6,595 · EducationADDISCODER INC: $6,123 · EducationIGNITE: $6,000 · EducationSheJumps: $5,247 · Education+2 more: $2,500 · EducationCambodian Childrens Fund: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF GIVE A FUTURE FOUNDATION INCC/O WEINBERG LIEBERMAN & CO: $6,830 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HEROES PROJECT: $6,317 · Public BenefitTHE TOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$4,653,012International$1,431,916Youth Development$410,156Education$90,852Philanthropy$27,830Public Benefit$11,317Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREFUGEE HOME PROJECT INC: $929,201 over 5y, 51% of budgetWhole Child International: $410,156 over 3y, 17% of budgetSTRONGER THAN EVER: $300,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC: $167,500 over 1y, 26% of budgetAmerican School in London Foundation: $107,215 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOLDEN DOOR SCHOLARS: $75,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE INSEAD MANAGEMENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW VISIONS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $26,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CONNECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $18,187 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAND IN HAND: $12,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVE A FUTURE FOUNDATION INCC/O WEINBERG LIEBERMAN & CO: $6,830 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE HEROES PROJECT: $6,317 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetADDISCODER INC: $6,123 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetIGNITE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSheJumps: $5,247 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,166 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRocky Mountain Womens Film Institute: $5,154 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE TOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUMOS FOUNDATION USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE AND SURF INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSUMMER ON THE HILL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826 National Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REFUGEE HOME PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Whole Child International ↗
  • Who funds STRONGER THAN EVER ↗
  • Who funds ABSOLUTE RETURN FOR KIDS US INC ↗
  • Who funds American School in London Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN DOOR SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds THE INSEAD MANAGEMENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY22.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ford Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bleu Blanc Rouge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bleu Blanc Rouge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bleu Blanc Rouge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bleu Blanc Rouge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bleu Blanc Rouge’s filings →

More from the funding graph