Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blank Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Blank Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Moody Bible Institute Of Chicago, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Blank Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $198k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’19
3
’20
3
’21
2
’22
4
’23
4
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$1.9MHuman Services$94kHousing & Shelter$50kAnimals$22kArts & Culture$15kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$4kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITANS PURSE$100,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC$50,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS$18,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
THE BAKKEN MUSEUM$5,000
VILLAGE SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE$5,000
HELPING PAWS$5,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING PAWS: $5k → 11%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MARTIN - ST LUCIE: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 7 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$2.0M
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+76%

Still filing today

86%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +120%
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $84k · revenue +43%
  • AW
    AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +76%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • VS
    VILLAGE SCHOOLS OF THE BIBLE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over seventy countries around the world.

International
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
5
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
8
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
9
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
10
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners; the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,894,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more: $150 · ReligionINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $84,200 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $3,750 · OtherHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $2,061 · AnimalsTHE BAKKEN: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHELPING PAWS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MARTIN / ST LUCIE INC: $4,375 · Human ServicesVILLAGE SCHOOLS OF THE BIBLE INC: $5,000 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $500 · Education
Religion$1,894,150Other$97,950Housing & Shelter$50,000Animals$17,061Arts & Culture$15,000Human Services$9,375Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,894,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $84,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAKKEN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVILLAGE SCHOOLS OF THE BIBLE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MARTIN / ST LUCIE INC: $4,375 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $2,061 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Daily Bread Ministries Trust: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blank Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blank Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blank Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph