Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blane Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$508kPhilanthropy$140kArts & Culture$56kHuman Services$16kAnimals$10kEducation$5kEmployment$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE ART CENTER$5,000
RESCUE CHICAGO$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 7%ASPIRITECH: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$562k · 5 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$562k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+107%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RP
    ROTARY - POLIO PLUS
    5× · 2019–2023 · $500k
  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +53%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +51%
  • VS
    VET SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
2
Hyde Park Art Center

The purpose of the hyde park art center (the art center) is to stimulate and sustain the visual arts in chicago. it does so by challenging and supporting artists, connecting artists to a broader public, and creating a community of people…

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
4
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
Pitch in

Established in 2011 by retired Chicago Cubs pitcher Kerry Wood, and his wife Sarah, Pitch In (fka Wood Family Foundation) seeks to improve the lives of children in four high-need neighborhoods in Chicago: North Lawndale, Humboldt Park,…

Philanthropy
7
ChiArts Foundation

Support and promotion of arts education programs at chicago high school for the arts. the organization may also support other educational activities in furtherance of the arts.

Education
8
Chicago Free School

Chicago Free School provides pre-kindergarten through 8th grade instruction and support activities. The faculty consists of qualified indiviuals with the appropriate education and experiende to provide students with the education that…

Education
9
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
10
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Norwegian American Hospital Foundation

Humboldt park health foundation seeks philanthropic support from individuals, businesses, foundations and community groups to help humboldt park health fulfill its mission as a premier health care provider that puts patients first and…

—
12
Hyde Park Jazz Festival

The Organization plans and produces the two day Hyde Park Jazz Festival, enhances cultural opportunities in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago and supports the Arts in Chicago.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education; the most unlike its peers is Paws Assisting Wounded Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY - POLIO PLUS: $500,000 · OtherROTARY - POLIO PLUSIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+17 more: $70,825 · Other+17 moreHighland Park Community Foundation: $140,000 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Com…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $33,000 · Arts & CultureFocus on the Arts Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Family Services: $10,000 · Human ServicesASPIRITECH NFP: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION: $5,000 · EducationEducare of West DuPage: $5,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthPAWS ASSISTING WOUNDED WARRIORS INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$670,825Philanthropy$140,000Arts & Culture$43,000Human Services$15,000Education$10,000Health$5,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $140,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $33,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFocus on the Arts Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEducare of West DuPage: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds Focus on the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ARTS PARTNERSHIPS IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Educare of West DuPage ↗
  • Who funds DIGS WITH DIGNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ASSISTING WOUNDED WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blane Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blane Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blane’s filings →

    More from the funding graph