· Private foundation
Blake Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $162k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $959k
- $250k+4 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER SCHOOL | $1,750,000 |
| BLAKE FAMILY FUND | $1,006,324 |
| THE LIZ BLAKE CHARITABLE FUND | $1,006,324 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $250,682 |
| HUDSON INSTITUTE INC | $204,404 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $200,384 |
| MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC | $200,384 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $125,000 |
| SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC | $76,652 |
| MOREHOUSE SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE | $51,101 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $51,031 |
| POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION | $35,771 |
| SKYLAND TRAIL | $25,551 |
| CHOA MARCUS AUTISM INSTITUTE | $25,551 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWThe Westminster Schools Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +43%
- AEAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH5× · 2019–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +47%
- MIMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC4× · 2021–2024 · $607k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- ELEMORY LAW SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $85k
- WFWESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +45%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Joyful Noise Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE GRADY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds JOYFUL NOISE PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA AQUARIUM INC & SUBSIDIARY ↗
- Who funds Purposity Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Agnes Scott College ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA WOMENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia Historical Society ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTERING ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Korean Friendship Society Inc ↗
- Who funds STAR C CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NO LONGER BOUND INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERS OUTREACH LLC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Rich Foundation Inc · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · John H & Wilhelmina D Harland Charitable Foundation · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Blake Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.