Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blackwell Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$15kHealth$12kYouth Development$8kHuman Services$8kReligion$6kEducation$1kCrime & Legal$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A Place at the Table$1,000
Lake Lure Recovery Fund$1,000
RHI Legacy Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
Neighbor to Neighbor$500
Step Up Ministry$500
Greater Raleigh Cleanup$500
Arise Collective$500
Transitions Life Care$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOUNDATIONS OF HOPE: $500 → 16%STEP UP MINISTRY: $1k → 8%Step Up Ministry: $1k → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $1k → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $500 → 8%Step Up Ministry: $500 → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $500 → 8%STEP UP MINISTRY: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CA
VA
AR
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$42k · 16 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
36

Total granted

$42k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+34%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    STEPUP MINISTRY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +55%
  • PA
    PRISON ALLIANCE INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $4k · revenue +33%
  • HEALING TRANSITIONS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $3k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • JA
    JOSEPH A VAUGHN PLAZA (FURMAN UNIVERSITY)
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • FO
    Foundation of Hope
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • AG
    ACTIVATE GOOD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
4
The Resiliency Collaborative Inc

Trc partners with bipoc youth and their ecosystems to strengthen their sense of identity, belonging, and purpose so they can create a healthier, more equitable wake county.

Education
5
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
6
Nc Warn Inc

To tackle the accelerating crisis of climate change by working to transition nc to clean, efficient energy & by watch-dogging utility practices. we pursue this work through grassroots activism, technical analysis, legal challenges and…

Environment
7
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
8
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
9
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
10
Evergreen Recovery Centers

To facilitate health and recovery for persons affected by alcoholism and other drug addiction through a comprehensive array of services, including residential and outpatient treatment, therapeutic daycare, parenting, detoxification, and…

Health
11
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arise Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rhi Legacy Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
21/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A PLACE AT THE TABLE: $13,200 · OtherA PLACE AT THE TABLEIndividual grant recipient: $5,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTransitions Life Care: $4,000 · OtherTransitions Life CareHAYES BARTON METHODIST CHURCH: $2,000 · OtherHAYES BARTON METHODIST CHURCHBLOOMHERE: $1,500 · Other+34 more: $10,900 · Other+34 moreHEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $3,250 · HealthHEALING TRAN…HOPE REINS: $1,250 · HealthHOPE REINSRHI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthRHI LEGACY F…+5 more: $600 · Health+5 moreSTEPUP MINISTRY: $5,000 · Human ServicesSTEPUP MIN…FOUNDATIONS FOR HOPE INC: $500 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION…PRISON ALLIANCE INC: $3,850 · EducationPRISON AL…ACTIVATE GOOD INC: $1,000 · EducationACTIVATE …District C: $500 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES: $500 · Youth DevelopmentOVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH: $500 · Youth DevelopmentARISE COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalOAK CITY CARES INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$37,050Health$6,100Human Services$5,500Education$4,850Youth Development$1,500Crime & Legal$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPUP MINISTRY: $5,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON ALLIANCE INC: $3,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOMHERE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE REINS: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRHI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTIVATE GOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARISE COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreat Raleigh Cleanup: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATIONS FOR HOPE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDistrict C: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE SPORTS COMMISSION: $300 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPUP MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds PRISON ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING TRANSITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMHERE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE REINS ↗
  • Who funds RHI LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTIVATE GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ARISE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK CITY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Raleigh Cleanup ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds District C ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds OVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE SPORTS COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds Lake Lure Flowering Bridge ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · Crossroads Fellowship Foundation · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Bob Barker Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Nancy a Wright Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blackwell Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blackwell Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blackwell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph