Skip to content
Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare

Bjc health system (bjc) is the parent corporation of a nonprofit health care organization serving primarily the residents of metropolitan st.

$7.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$191MEducation$6.6MHuman Services$3.6MRecreation & Sports$3.1MCommunity Improvement$2.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.6MYouth Development$1.2MArts & Culture$356kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 52 grants below total $7,577,574, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,729,173 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,599 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $122k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $397k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $226k
  • $250k+6 grants · $6.8M
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$7.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREST PARK FOREVER$2,505,000
BIOSTL$2,250,000
THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS$856,040
OASIS INSTITUTE$455,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$416,977
SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION$350,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC$132,927
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$92,765
ST LOUIS DOULA PROJECT INC$40,000
JAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE$25,000
URBAN LEAGUE METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$25,000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF ST CHARLES COUNTY$20,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN$20,000
HAWTHORN FOUNDATION$20,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE RANCH OF MISSOURI: $7k → 9%YOUTH IN NEED INC: $7k → 5%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $6k → 5%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $11k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $6k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $6k → 11%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METRO ST LOUIS: $8k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 21%OASIS INSTITUTE: $450k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $401k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $400k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $400k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $400k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $400k → 11%THE OASIS INSTITUTE: $400k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION: $66k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION: $26k → 11%PROMO FUND: $10k → 21%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 11%OASIS INSTITUTE: $455k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS EASTERN MISSOURI REG: $10k → 11%MO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10k → 21%MO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10k → 21%MO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $8k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
OH
NJ
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205M · 52 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
38

Total granted

$205M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

94%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $189M · revenue +76%
  • TS
    THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +99%
  • TO
    THE OASIS INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • SO
    SURGICAL OUTREACH FOR THE AMERICASgraduated
    2× · 2020–2021 · $374k · revenue +223%
  • TM
    The Missouri Foundation for Health
    one grant, 2017 · $132k · revenue -19%
  • RC
    RISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $123k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
2
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
3
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
4
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
5
Build Missouri Health

To foster and amplify community-led innovations through partnerships resulting in radical system changes that create equitable health outcomes.

Human Services
6
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
7
Bionexus Kc

We inspire thinkers from different disciplines to combine their efforts for a common purpose: healthcare innovation.(continued on schedule o)from bioinformatics to cancer research and beyond, we stimulate collaboration and help bring…

Science & Tech
8
Neighborhood Solidarity Fund

Invest stl facilitates investment in the power of people and their neighborhoods to develop communities of justice and opportunity in places that continue to endure the legacy of systemic anti-black racism.

Community Improvement
9
St Louis Regional Economic Development Alliance

Alliance stl is the business attraction initiative of greater st. louis, inc. greater st. louis, inc. is a nonprofit investor-supported organization comprised of businesses, institutions and organizations of all sizes that reflect the full…

—
10
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
11
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
12
Missouri Center for Patient Safety

Center for patient safety seeks to reduce preventable patient harm by improving patient safety culture, working in collaboration with providers, associations and government entities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Commission of Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Rx Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/109
Grantees still filing
56/109
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $189,178,503 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY+9 more: $2,951,222 · EducationTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $3,609,248 · OtherCONVOY OF HOPE: $1,086,952 · OtherGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $600,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $348,627 · OtherTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $350,000 · Other+51 more: $1,796,311 · OtherTHE OASIS INSTITUTE: $3,305,500 · Human Services+11 more: $223,515 · Human ServicesForest Park Forever Inc: $2,505,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $617,265 · HealthSURGICAL OUTREACH FOR THE AMERICAS: $374,322 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $145,000 · HealthThe Missouri Foundation for Health: $132,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $90,450 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $86,776 · HealthINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $74,000 · Health+24 more: $552,492 · HealthCORTEX: $1,294,919 · Community ImprovementBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $125,680 · Community ImprovementREGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC: $80,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $16,500 · Community ImprovementBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,116,000 · Youth Development+4 more: $92,500 · Youth Development
Education$192,129,725Other$7,791,138Human Services$3,529,015Environment$2,505,000Health$2,072,305Community Improvement$1,517,099Youth Development$1,208,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $189,178,503 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $3,609,248 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetTHE OASIS INSTITUTE: $3,305,500 over 8y, 14% of budgetBIOSTL: $2,641,001 over 6y, 13% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $2,505,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetCORTEX: $1,294,919 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,116,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $1,086,952 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $617,265 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $348,627 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCIVIC PROGRESS INC: $226,250 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetCONCORDANCE: $220,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $145,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Missouri Foundation for Health: $132,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $129,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $125,680 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $123,413 over 1y, 12% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $107,650 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $95,525 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $90,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $86,776 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL UNION CONSTRUCTION CENTERINC: $80,000 over 8y, 19% of budgetINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $74,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $65,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetPride St Louis Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetHAWTHORN FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $50,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFAIR SAINT LOUIS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $40,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL CHAMBER & GROWTH ASSOCIATION: $38,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRX Outreach Inc: $35,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST CHARLES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSt Louis Black Authors of Childrens Literature: $34,125 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetTHE FIT AND FOOD CONNECTION: $32,500 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetA RED CIRCLE: $32,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $30,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESPIRATORY EQUITY: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $28,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK: $26,642 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOONE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetProvident Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…Commerce Bancshares F…World Wide Technology…Centene FoundationSt Louis Community Fo…Edward Jones Foundati…Washington UniversityEmployees Community F…Trio Foundation of St…Youthbridge Community…Moneta Group Charitab…
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO78.9× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Centene Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Washington University · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home