Skip to content

· Private foundation

Binkley Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$137kEducation$75kCivil Rights$25kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kHousing & Shelter$1kHealth$500Other$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHENAL VALLEY CHURCH$19,211
HARDING UNIVERSITY$13,000
BOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL$2,500
LAMESA CHURCH OF CHRIST$1,500
CENTRAL CHURCH OF CHRIST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FAIR HAVEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 7 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +205% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$210k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+205%
+14%

Still filing today

29%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CHENAL VALLEY CHURCH
    6× · 2017–2023 · $110k
  • Harding University Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue -12%
  • SC
    SILVER CITY CHURCH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $12k

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATI
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • AI
    ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -27%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - NATIONAL CO
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Happy Hill Farm Childrens Home Inc

The purpose of the Home is to prepare students for advanced education through a rigorous, college-preparatory educational program taught within a Christian worldview framework. Students are also prepared for life as informed, ethical,…

Human Services
2
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
3
Homes of Hope for Children Inc

To serve children in crisis throughout mississippi by providing strong, christian homes to every child who lives on campus while ensuring that each child is loved unconditionally and has their physical, spiritual, and emotional needs met.

Human Services
4
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
5
His House Inc

To provide a quality chirstian based education to financially and socially disadvantaged children and stop the cycle of both spiritual and financial poverty

Religion
6
East Tennessee Christian Home Inc

The Home was organized to provide for the health, welfare and benefit of children whose parents or guardians are unable to care for them. The Home offers residential care and onsite academic

Human Services
7
Fhl Academy Inc

Give children the opportunity to learn in an environment where their education is based upon strong biblical values and truths.

Education
8
Hope of Honduras Inc

Organization operates a children's home in Honduras that provides food, clothing, shelter, medical care and education to abused and abandonded children in need.

International
9
His Haitian Interdenominational Shelter Home for Children

H.I.S Home For Children is an interdenominational Christian ministry that was developed to care for orphaned and abandoned children and special needs young adults in Haiti.

Human Services
10
Hearts for Jesus Christ Christian Education Institute

Hearts for jesus christ christian education institute, or hearts as we are widely known, is a specialized educational community for chrisitan homeschooling families with children in pre-school through 12th grade. hearts is also a ministry…

Education
11
Harrells Christian Academy

The mission of harrells christian academy is to prepare each student for higher education within an environment that instills judeo-christian values, fosters self-discipline, enhances creativity, and promises a love and respect for…

Education
12
Christian Heritage Academy

The school provides primary, secondary, and special needs education in addition to extended care programs and home schooling opportunities, all within a christian world view.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fair Haven Children's Home; the most unlike its peers is Boyd Buchanan School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHENAL VALLEY CHURCH: $110,211 · OtherCHENAL VALLEY CHURCHHarding University Inc: $67,800 · OtherHarding University IncTHE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATI: $25,000 · OtherTHE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATISILVER CITY CHURCH: $11,850 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF CHRIST OF BROKEN ARROW: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $17,600 · Other+8 moreARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $5,000 · EducationBOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL: $2,500 · EducationHOPE HARBOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · PhilanthropyHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · HealthCARTI Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthNEW HEIGHTS SUMMER CAMP INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentFAIR HAVEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 · Human Services
Other$242,461Education$7,500Philanthropy$2,750Health$2,500Youth Development$2,000Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHarding University Inc: $67,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE HARBOR FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS SUMMER CAMP INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCARTI Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR HAVEN CHILDREN'S HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYD BUCHANAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HEIGHTS SUMMER CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds CARTI Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR HAVEN CHILDREN'S HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Binkley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Binkley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Binkley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph