Skip to content

· Private foundation

Billy & Clara Mosing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2023
26
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$62k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

75% of Billy & Clara Mosing Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Acadiana, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Billy & Clara Mosing Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $400k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
3
’18
5
’19
0
’20
11
’21
16
’22
14
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.0MReligion$414kRecreation & Sports$338kHealth$263kEducation$255kHuman Services$231kAnimals$58kHousing & Shelter$57kOther$0
02FY2023 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $162k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I AM HERD$62,000
SKY HIGH FOR KIDS$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE F$50,000
PRAYER PONY FOUNDATION$28,000
ST THERESA CATHOLIC CHURCH$25,000
IN OUR HANDS RESCUE$20,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$20,000
WILLIAMS COMMUNITY SCHOOL$20,000
ST MATHILDA CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE CARMELITE MONASTERY OF LAFAYETTE LA$10,000
ELIZONDO TENNIS FOUNDATION$10,000
ST EDMUND CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
HOSPICE OF ACADIANA$10,000
FOSTER THE LOVE LOUISIANA INC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%I AM HERD: $62k → 19%I AM HERD: $62k → 19%I AM HERD: $28k → 19%I AM HERD: $25k → 19%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA: $55k → 17%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF ACADIANA: $10k → 17%THE DESORMEAUX FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%THE DESORMEAUX FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%THE DESORMEAUX FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 28 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$143k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $987k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    I AM HERD
    4× · 2019–2023 · $177k · revenue +226% · 34% of their budget
  • SH
    SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +25%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • BT
    BE THE EXCEPTION COUNSELING FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Take Paws Rescue

The mission of take paws rescue is to meet the moral obligation to protect and save the lives of pets in need of rescue in louisiana. take paws rescue enacts this mission by pulling pets from rural and high kill shelters and preparing them…

Animals
2
Acadiana Animal Aid

Lafayette Animal Aid was incorporated and filed for exempt status 501(c)(3) in 1976 with sole purpose of helping to manage and care for the animal population in the lafayette Parish Area of Louisiana.

Animals
3
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
4
Almost Home Humane Society Inc

Almost Home Humane Society is an agency providing care for animals and animal education in the Greater Lafayette area.

Animals
5
Laurels House

Laurel's House strengthens the human animal bond improves public health decreases the number of companion animal euthanasia due to overpopulation and diminishes human impact on native wildlife species by providing unprecedented access to…

—
6
Heart of Louisiana Humane Society
Animals
7
Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless

The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…

Community Improvement
8
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
9
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
10
Citizens for Animal Protection Inc

Citizens for Animal Protection, Inc. (CAP) cares for pets in need through sheltering, adoption, humane education, spay/neuter services, low-cost wellness, and community outreach. CAP fulfills its mission by focusing on enhancing the lives…

Animals
11
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
12
Child Advocacy Services Inc

Child advocacy services gives voice, healing, and security to children in ten parishes in southeast louisiana through its casa program, children's advocacy program, and prevention education.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Acadiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is I Am Herd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Community Foundation of Acadiana: $2,961,938 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of AcadianaIndividual grant recipient: $987,314 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRAGIN CAJUN ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $298,000 · OtherRAGIN CAJUN ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONPRAYER PONY FOUNDATION INC: $129,000 · OtherPRAYER PONY FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE F: $126,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE FST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherWILLIAMS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $98,000 · Other+24 more: $437,000 · Other+24 moreI AM HERD: $177,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER THE LOVE LOUISIANAINC: $12,000 · Human ServicesDesormeaux Foundation Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC: $150,000 · HealthMILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES: $15,000 · HealthCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $38,000 · Crime & LegalAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $20,000 · AnimalsAustin Wildlife Rescue: $18,000 · AnimalsLafayette Central Park Inc: $20,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$2,961,938Other$2,175,314Human Services$275,000Health$165,000Crime & Legal$38,000Animals$38,000Recreation & Sports$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Foundation of Acadiana: $2,961,938 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetI AM HERD: $177,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $38,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLafayette Central Park Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAustin Wildlife Rescue: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING HOUSE INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHouston Hospice: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFOSTER THE LOVE LOUISIANAINC: $12,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetDesormeaux Foundation Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ACADIANA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Foundation of Acadiana ↗
  • Who funds I AM HERD ↗
  • Who funds SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF ACADIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds IN OUR HANDS RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Lafayette Central Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Wildlife Rescue ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Hospice ↗
  • Who funds MILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER THE LOVE LOUISIANAINC ↗
  • Who funds Desormeaux Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ACADIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mills Family Foundation IncLA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mills Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Acadiana · Pinhook Foundation Inc · Knight Family Foundation Formerly the Eddy Knight Family Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · James D Moncus Family Foundation · Martial F Billeaud Sr Foundation · The Rucks Family Foundation · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · William C Schumacher Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Billy & Clara Mosing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Billy & Clara Mosing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Billy & Clara Mosing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph