Skip to content
Bike and Build Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Bike and Build Inc

Before its dissolution, bike & build benefitted affordable housing and empowered young adults for a lifetime of service and civic engagement through service oriented cycling trips.

$3k
Granted FY2020
2
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Housing & Shelter$38kCommunity Improvement$34kCivil Rights$11kYouth Development$7kPublic Benefit$6kEnvironment$6kEmployment$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY REBUILDS$5,250
MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE EL BARRIO$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION DBA YOUTHBUILD LOUISVILLE: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
NM
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
2
Homes for Change
Human Services
3
Habitat for Humanity East Bay Silicon Valley

We believe everyone deserves a decent place to live. by building, preserving, and expanding fair access to affordable homeownership, habitat partners with people and families to build strong futures on the foundation of a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
4
Housing Affordability Institute
Housing & Shelter
5
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
6
Affordable Housing Accreditation Board
—
7
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
8
Habitat for Humanity for San Luis Obispo County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity for san luis obispo brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
9
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter
10
New Horizon Community Develpom

The mission is to provide quailty affordable housing alternatives for the people of Plaqumine

Housing & Shelter
11
Equity Homes
Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is Social Justice Tours. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGIC CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE: $22,643 · OtherMAGIC CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVESANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,090 · OtherSANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCATCH THE BUILDING SPIRIT: $7,000 · OtherCATCH THE BUILDING SPIRITPIEDMONT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 · OtherPIEDMONT HABITAT FOR HUMANITYYOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC: $5,196 · OtherYOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INClowernineorg: $5,000 · OtherlowernineorgJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · OtherJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INCNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALIT: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTH SHORE COMM…NORTHWEST INDIAN HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $6,187 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST INDIAN…MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO INC: $10,500 · Civil RightsMOVEMENT F…COMMUNITY REBUILDS: $10,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY …ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOCIAL JUSTICE TOURS: $6,167 · Public BenefitGRID ALTERNATIVES: $5,898 · Environment
Other$58,929Housing & Shelter$17,187Civil Rights$10,500Health$10,500Youth Development$7,000Public Benefit$6,167Environment$5,898

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALIT: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO INC: $10,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY REBUILDS: $10,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSANTA FE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,090 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $7,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHWEST INDIAN HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $6,187 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE TOURS: $6,167 over 1y, 27% of budgetGRID ALTERNATIVES: $5,898 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetlowernineorg: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bike and Build Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bike and Build Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 48%
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
  • North Shore Community Development Coalit: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bike and Build’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home