Skip to content

· Public charity

Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star

To enrich, encourage and empower children to reach their highest potential through safe, positive, one-to-one mentoring relationships.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$9.4M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $454k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.6M
$121,430
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION$1,070,701
BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS$979,357
BBBS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$522,015
BBBS GULF COAST$121,430
BBBS of Hereford Texas$116,308
BBBS OF EL PASO$109,828
BBBS of Lubbock$106,115
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $68k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $135k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $979k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $131k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $156k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $110k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $51k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $121k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $924k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $116k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $109k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $94k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $49k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $103k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $706k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $105k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $106k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $83k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $22k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $56k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $437k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $85k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $100k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $61k → 21%BBBS GULF COAST: $56k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $554k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $405k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $84k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $76k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $49k → 21%BBBS GULF COAST: $55k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $390k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $77k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $69k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $40k → 21%BBBS GULF COAST: $27k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $230k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $47k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $44k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $29k → 21%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $180k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $41k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $32k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$12M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +83%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +561% · 48% of their budget
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $692k · revenue +30% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Kennebec Valley

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of area youth.

    —
    2
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

    To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

    —
    3
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Palm Beach & Martin Counties Inc

    The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth, helping them achieve their full potential.

    —
    4
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metropolitan Detroit

    To provide children facing adversity with safe, strong, and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever

    —
    5
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Heart of Georgia Inc

    The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    —
    6
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Permian Basin Inc

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    —
    7
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeastern Ohio

    To help children reach their potential through professionally supported, one-to-one relationships with measurable impact. this is achieved by matching children with adults in mentoring relationships, providing children with companionship…

    —
    8
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Harrisonburg Rockingham County Inc

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    —
    9
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of

    The mission of big brothers big sisters is to make a positive difference in the lives of children, who are facing emotional, social and academic challenges. through professional-supported relationships with a caring adult, big brothers big…

    —
    10
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Appalachian Ohio

    The organization matches adults in the community with children who want guidance and a relationship with an adult.

    —
    11
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Inc

    Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. BBBS is accountable for enrolled youthbuilding socio-emotional competencies, increasing academic achievement, and creating healthy…

    —
    12
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mississippi

    Big brothers big sisters of mississippi previously recruited adults to work with children one-on-one and act as their mentor. these volunteers were supervised by trained professionals who assess the growth & development of the children.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $4,251,629 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $3,327,302 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $691,944 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INCBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INC: $687,017 · OtherBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INCGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC: $568,601 · OtherGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC: $487,311 · Other+1 more: $205,393 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION: $2,225,035 · PhilanthropyBIG BROTHERS BIG SIS…
    Other$10,219,197Philanthropy$2,225,035

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $4,251,629 over 8y, 24% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $3,327,302 over 8y, 33% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION: $2,225,035 over 6y, 48% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $691,944 over 8y, 35% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INC: $687,017 over 8y, 61% of budgetGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC: $568,601 over 8y, 32% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC: $487,311 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INC: $205,393 over 5y, 30% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INC ↗
    • Who funds GULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC ↗
    • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star’s filings →

      More from the funding graph