Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star

To enrich, encourage and empower children to reach their highest potential through safe, positive, one-to-one mentoring relationships.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$924k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Youth Development$9.4M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $623k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS$923,886
BBBS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$698,023
BBBS of Lubbock$155,715
BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION$150,000
BBBS of Hereford Texas$130,682
BBBS GULF COAST$103,160
BBBS OF EL PASO$83,238
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $68k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $135k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $924k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $131k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $156k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $94k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $51k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $103k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $706k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $105k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $109k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $83k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $49k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $56k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $437k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $85k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $100k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $61k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $22k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $56k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $554k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $405k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $84k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $76k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $49k → 21%BBBS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $16k → 9%BBBS GULF COAST: $55k → 14%BBBS LONESTAR FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $390k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $77k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $69k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $40k → 21%BBBS GULF COAST: $27k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $230k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $47k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $44k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $29k → 21%BBBS GULF COAST: $14k → 14%BBBS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $180k → 16%BBBS of Hereford Texas: $41k → 17%BBBS of Lubbock: $32k → 17%BBBS OF EL PASO: $21k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.4M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$9.4M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +83%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +9% · 33% of their budget
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +63% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

    To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

    2
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Kennebec Valley

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of area youth.

    3
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Heart of Georgia Inc

    The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    4
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metropolitan Detroit

    To provide children facing adversity with safe, strong, and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever

    5
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeastern Ohio

    To help children reach their potential through professionally supported, one-to-one relationships with measurable impact. this is achieved by matching children with adults in mentoring relationships, providing children with companionship…

    6
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Mississippi

    Big brothers big sisters of mississippi previously recruited adults to work with children one-on-one and act as their mentor. these volunteers were supervised by trained professionals who assess the growth & development of the children.

    7
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Palm Beach & Martin Counties Inc

    The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth, helping them achieve their full potential.

    8
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Permian Basin Inc

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    9
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Central Indiana

    Our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and potential of youth. our vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

    10
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Long Island Inc

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    11
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Harrisonburg Rockingham County Inc

    To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

    12
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Appalachian Ohio

    The organization matches adults in the community with children who want guidance and a relationship with an adult.

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $3,272,272 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $2,805,287 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC — $585,829 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INCBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INC — $570,709 · OtherBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INCGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC — $447,171 · OtherGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC — $377,483 · Other+1 more — $205,393 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION — $1,154,334 · PhilanthropyBIG BROTHERS …
    Other$8,264,144Philanthropy$1,154,334

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $3,272,272 over 7y, 24% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $2,805,287 over 7y, 33% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR FOUNDATION — $1,154,334 over 5y, 47% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LUBBOCK INC — $585,829 over 7y, 35% of budgetBIG BROTHERS-BIG SISTERS OF HEREFORD TEXAS INC — $570,709 over 7y, 61% of budgetGULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC — $447,171 over 7y, 32% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC — $377,483 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INC — $205,393 over 5y, 30% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaFL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Big Brothers Big Sisters Lone Star funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    2021222324
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY2024

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph