Skip to content

· Private foundation

Biery Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$211k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$511kRecreation & Sports$469kPhilanthropy$93kArts & Culture$86kHuman Services$63kReligion$58kYouth Development$40kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WALSH UNIVERSITY$100,000
CANTON PALACE THEATRE$25,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADO$20,000
HANNAH HOUSE$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER STARK COUNTY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
COPELAND OAKS$5,000
CANTON BALLET$5,000
LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
LOUISVILLE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$1,000
ST JOSEPH PARISH$1,000
LOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$675
MASSILLON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 12%COPELAND OAKS: $5k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 12%COPELAND OAKS: $5k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 12%COPELAND OAKS: $5k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 12%COPELAND OAKS: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 22 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$153k

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    Walsh University Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $330k · revenue +3%
  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +37%
  • CB
    CANTON BALLET
    4× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOUISVILLE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $55k
  • AD
    AGRICULTURAL DESIGN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
7
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
8
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel college of nursing is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

—
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
11
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
12
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is The Louisville Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOUISVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $316,702 · OtherLOUISVILLE CITY SCHOOLSLOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $70,675 · OtherLOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYLOUISVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherLOUISVILLE HIGH SCHOOLUNITED WAY OF GREATER STARK CO: $40,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER STARK COHANNAH HOUSE: $40,000 · OtherHANNAH HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherAGRICULTURAL DESIGN INC: $30,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $134,180 · Other+17 moreWalsh University Inc: $329,500 · EducationWalsh University IncUniversity of Mount Union: $61,000 · EducationUniversity of Mount UnionMALONE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationCANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCANTON BALLET: $20,500 · Arts & CultureARTS IN STARK: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesCOPELAND OAKS: $20,000 · Human ServicesUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION NO COLORADO: $20,000 · ReligionTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $8,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$744,757Education$405,500Arts & Culture$65,500Human Services$60,000Philanthropy$53,000Religion$20,000Crime & Legal$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWalsh University Inc: $329,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $61,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $50,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCANTON BALLET: $20,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOPELAND OAKS: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Stark County ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CANTON PALACE THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CANTON BALLET ↗
  • Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
  • Who funds COPELAND OAKS ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION NO COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Ervin & Marie Wilkof Foundation · The Fitzpatrick Foundation Inc · Ada C Rank & Helen J Rank Charitable · Diebold Employees Charitable Fd Ta · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Biery Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Biery Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Biery Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Biery Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Biery Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph