Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bidikov Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$59kArts & Culture$45kHuman Services$33kEducation$27kReligion$20kPhilanthropy$15kCommunity Improvement$6kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$505k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RMC FOUNDATION$11,000
SANAPRIA COMM LLC$10,000
RAINBOW OMEGA$7,000
1819 NEWS$7,000
ATLANTA OPERA$6,000
OXFORD PERFORMING ART CENTER$6,000
INTERFAITH MINISTRY$5,000
CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME$3,000
YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY$2,000
LONG LEAF BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RAINBOW OMEGA: $10k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $7k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $7k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $2k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $1k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 20 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$239k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-5%

Still filing today

30%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    RAINBOW OMEGA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +6%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +112%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHAUNTI HEALING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • AD
    ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
2
Annapolis Christian Academy

Private school for grades k-12

Education
3
Agape Schools

Religious preschool and daycare services

Human Services
4
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
Russell Sage College

To cultivate, inspire, and transform our students in a nurturing, yet challenging, educational environment to become the managers and leaders organizations need right now.

Education
12
National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Shanti Behavioral Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Shanti Behavioral Health: $30,000 · OtherShanti Behavioral HealthINTERFAITH MINISTRY: $25,000 · OtherINTERFAITH MINISTRYRUBATO INTERNATIONAL PIANO COMPETITION: $22,500 · OtherRUBATO INTERNATIONAL PIANO COMPETITIONOXFORD PERFORMING ART CENTER: $20,499 · OtherOXFORD PERFORMING ART CENTERSANAPRIA COMM LLC: $20,000 · OtherSANAPRIA COMM LLCRMC FOUNDATION: $15,350 · OtherRMC FOUNDATIONSHAUNTI HEALING CENTER: $12,750 · OtherSHAUNTI HEALING CENTERCAST: $8,000 · Other1819 NEWS: $7,000 · Other+17 more: $39,273 · Other+17 moreRAINBOW OMEGA INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW OMEGA I…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHR…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationTHE ATLANTA OPERA INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureWOODSON CENTER: $6,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $5,000 · PhilanthropyANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$200,372Human Services$40,000Education$22,000Arts & Culture$11,000Community Improvement$6,000Philanthropy$5,000Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetShanti Behavioral Health: $30,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetRAINBOW OMEGA INC: $28,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ATLANTA OPERA INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shanti Behavioral Health ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW OMEGA INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama ↗
  • Who funds ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northeast AlabamaAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bidikov Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bidikov Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bidikov Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bidikov Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bidikov’s filings →

    More from the funding graph