Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bialis Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Philanthropy$5.0MHealth$329kEducation$48kReligion$41kInternational$36kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.2M
$1,399,491
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #0843$1,401,169
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #5561$1,399,491
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #1235$1,397,911
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACTION FOR POST SOVIET JEWRY: $36k → 8%LUCILLE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $18k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 10%LOVE HEELS CANINE PARTNERS: $1k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%ANIMAL SHELTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $10k → 14%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%COMMUNITY SHUL OF MONTECITO: $19k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%AAPLE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR MYELOMA & BONE CANCER: $200k → 14%SANTA BARBARA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR MYELOMA & BONE CANCER: $50k → 14%SANTA BARBARA JEWISH FEDERATION: $7k → 14%THE AURELIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SANTA BARBARA JEWISH FEDERATION: $3k → 14%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $25k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $350k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

6%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$300k · 3 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$300k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+12%

Still filing today

33%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR MYELOMA & BONE CANCER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $250k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    2× · 2021–2023 · $40k · revenue +34%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA JEWISH FEDERATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k

Funded once

  • AF
    ACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue -11%
  • Teach for America Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +20%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SHUL OF MONTECITO AND SANTA BARBARA
    one grant, 2022 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

5
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
6
Santa Monica Education Foundation

The Santa Monica Education Foundation (SMEF) raises funds to enhance and supplement the curriculum of every public school in the city of Santa Monica.

7
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

9
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

10
Santa Barbara Public Library Foundation

The santa barbara public library foundation supports the long-term health and sustainability of the santa barbara public library through public-private partnerships.

Public Benefit
11
Santa Barbara Foundation

The mission of the santa barbara foundation (sbf) is to mobilize collective wisdom and philanthropic capital to build empathetic, inclusive and resilient communities.

Philanthropy
12
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc and the most unlike its peers is Animal Shelter Assistance Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #0843 — $1,401,169 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #0843SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #5561 — $1,399,491 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #5561SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #1235 — $1,397,911 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND #1235THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $350,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINSTITUTE FOR MYELOMA & BONE CANCER — $250,000 · Other+6 more — $62,600 · OtherDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $428,600 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADV…+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $40,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $18,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 · HealthTeach for America Inc — $25,000 · EducationSanta Barbara Education Foundation — $12,500 · EducationACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC — $36,000 · InternationalAnimal Shelter Assistance Program — $10,000 · AnimalsAAPLE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public BenefitSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,861,171Philanthropy$433,600Health$68,000Education$37,500International$36,000Animals$10,000Public Benefit$10,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $428,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACTION FOR POST-SOVIET JEWRY INC — $36,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation — $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Shelter Assistance Program — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAAPLE ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bialis Charitable TrustCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bialis Charitable Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bialis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bialis Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bialis Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph