Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bh Klein Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0157% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$91kPhilanthropy$30kYouth Development$8kHealth$8kInternational$4kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS LESS THAN 1000$4,923
THE OJC FUND$2,300
Individual grant recipient$1,180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sparks of Life: $100 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $100 → 11%Oorah: $60 → 11%Avihem: $360 → 20%Bikur Cholim of Lakewood: $48 → 11%Atime: $180 → 20%Atime: $180 → 20%Ahavas Tzedaka: $36 → 11%Ahavas Tzedaka: $36 → 11%Bikur Cholim of Lakewood: $36 → 11%Atime: $108 → 20%Bikur Cholim of Lakewood: $36 → 11%Ahavas Tzedokos Corp: $36 → 11%Technology Awareness Group Inc: $18 → 11%Bonei Olam: $1k → 20%Atime: $72 → 20%Atime: $54 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 24 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
177

Total granted

$136k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+31%

Still filing today

17%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SK
    S KUTLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +49%
  • TT
    TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +1%
  • AT
    A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange
    4× · 2017–2020 · $594 · revenue +346%

Funded once

  • VS
    Various Small Donations
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • G
    Globerman
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Avodat Avraham Inc
Religion
2
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Lev Tamim Inc
Philanthropy
8
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
9
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
10
Ohr Avrohom and Moshe Inc

We support religious organizations in the us and israel by providing grants.

Public Benefit
11
The Mikvah Ltd
Philanthropy
12
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oorah Inc; the most unlike its peers is S Kutler Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Various Contributions Less Than 1500: $35,175 · OtherVarious Contributions Less Than 1500Various Small Donations: $28,985 · OtherVarious Small DonationsZichron Yisroel: $14,680 · OtherZichron YisroelCONGREGATION TIFERES SHULEM INC: $13,770 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES SHULEM INC+175 more: $147,222 · Other+175 moreTHE OJC FUND: $18,650 · EducationTHE OJC F…TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $4,212 · EducationTALMUD TO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $1,500 · EducationAMERICAN …+2 more: $136 · EducationS KUTLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $11,100 · Philanthropy+1 more: $30 · PhilanthropyBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $594 · Human ServicesAVIHEM INC: $360 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $172 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $120 · Human ServicesSPARKS OF LIFE INC: $100 · Human Services+3 more: $114 · Human ServicesKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $2,142 · InternationalTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $180 · ReligionLEV BEREL INC: $180 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $36 · ReligionCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $50 · Health
Other$239,832Education$24,498Philanthropy$11,130Human Services$2,460International$2,142Religion$396Health$50

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $18,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetS KUTLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $11,100 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $4,212 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $2,142 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $594 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAVIHEM INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKS OF LIFE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF LAKEWOOD INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOLOGY AWARENESS GROUP: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds S KUTLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY43.9× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · Blum Foundation · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · Lcpv Foundation Inc · Keren Yud Mem Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bh Klein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bh Klein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School: 1% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bh Klein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bh Klein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 203 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bh Klein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph