Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beyond the Mark Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$394k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$228k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$816kEducation$205kPublic Benefit$195kHuman Services$39kEmployment$12kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$7kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $378k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$771k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$227,690
SHOE4AFRICA$150,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SARUNI INTERNATIONAL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$500
PONDEROSA HIGH SCHOOL$104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%DIAR FOUNDATION: $5k → 3%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 12 repeat orgs$440k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +203% since the first grant, against +70% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
92

Total granted

$1.7M
$416k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+203%
+70%

Still filing today

17%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2024 · $838k
  • SI
    SHOE4AFRICA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $813k · revenue +203% · 44% of their budget
  • CJ
    CAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue -58%

Funded once

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT
    one grant, 2017 · $195k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute

To fund cystic fibrosis research, provide educational and personal support, and to spread awareness of cystic fibrosis, a life-threatening genetic disease.

Health
2
Global Girls Global Women Inc

A 503C3 Organization design to equip suffering girls and women around the world by helping them gain access to quality healthcare, education and economic empowerment initiatives aimed to foster self-este

Recreation & Sports
3
Girls Gotta Run Foundation Incorporated

Girls Gotta Run invests in Ethiopian girls (and their mothers) who use running and education to empower themselves and their communities in Ethiopia.

International
4
The Ciri Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Kuramo Foundation for Sustainable Development Inc
Community Improvement
6
Afe Foundation

We are committed to identifying the cause, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of amniotic fluid embolism and bring our information and resources to healthcare providers and impacted families through our education and support programs.We…

Health
7
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
8
Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation

Diabetes action research and education foundation is committed to the prevention and treatment of diabetes and to the funding of innovative, promising research aimed at finding a cure for diabetes and diabetes-related complications.

Health
9
Cidrz Foundation

The cidrz foundation exists to provide support for research, treatment and training to improve health outcomes in zambia and the rest of africa.

—
10
The Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation

The adenoid cystic carcinoma research foundation (accrf) supports research into adenoid cystic carcinoma that will accelerate the development of improved therapies and a cure for the disease.

Health
11
Cmt Research Foundation Inc

With a single focus on funding research, the CMT Research Foundation exclusively funds research leading to the discovery, development, and clinical application of treatments and cures for Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT).

Health
12
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is SHOE4AFRICA Inc; the most unlike its peers is Diar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $837,690 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT: $195,000 · OtherCORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT+106 more: $259,375 · Other+106 moreSHOE4AFRICA INC: $813,403 · Recreation & SportsSHOE4AFRICA INC+1 more: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Human ServicesDIAR Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,400 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationSARUNI INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 · International
Other$1,292,065Recreation & Sports$816,403Human Services$16,500Health$5,900Education$1,500International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHOE4AFRICA INC: $813,403 over 6y, 44% of budgetCAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetDIAR Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARUNI INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHOE4AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBODIA JOB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIAR Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN RETT ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beyond the Mark Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beyond the Mark Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beyond the Mark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph