Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$507kRecreation & Sports$390kYouth Development$355kHuman Services$230kArts & Culture$82kPublic Benefit$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kCommunity Improvement$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k58 grants · $164k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RRMR SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
GREATER IOWA YOUTH FOR CHRIST$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,200
YMCA REHABILITATION CENTER$5,500
MASON CITY SHOOL DISTRICT$5,500
MOHAWK DANZERS$5,000
MASON CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
SHEFFIELD BETTERMENT FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTH IOWA HUMAN POWERED TRAILS$5,000
RRMR SUMMER PROGRAM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BUILD A BETTER BELMOND$5,000
YSS FKA FRANCIS LAUER$5,000
FRIENDS OF BEEDS LAKE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $3k → 12%APPLE DAYCARE: $5k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $3k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $3k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $3k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $2k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $2k → 12%OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $1k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $8k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $8k → 12%AVALON CENTER: $5k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 12%AVALON CENTER: $5k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 12%TLC THE LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 12%AVALON CENTER: $3k → 12%MASON CITY FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 76 repeat orgs$469k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
70

Total granted

$1.4M
$411k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

18%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    One Vision
    5× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +13%
  • NI
    NORTH IOWA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    4× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +6%
  • TT
    TLC The Learning Center
    7× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FL
    FRANCIS LAUER YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • MF
    MERCY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • MC
    MASON CITY SOCCER CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ames Community Preschool Center

To provide consistent, reliable, safe and affordable childcare to Ames area children that engages each child and encourages his or her best personal growth and development.

Human Services
2
East Mills Child Care Solutions

The organization was created to own the property and operate a childcare facility serving the east mills community school district and the surrounding areas.

Human Services
3
Keokuk County Fair

To provide a county fair for rural iowa

—
4
Heart Song Inc

Provide adult day center and senior center for older adults in southeast iowa.

Human Services
5
Grand View Child Development Center Inc

Provide affordable child care services to residents of des moines and surrounding communities

Human Services
6
Kids World Inc

Provide day care services to the children in and around sac city, iowa

Human Services
7
Diamond Trail Youth Corporation

To provide a public daycare and preschool to the lynnville, iowa area.

Human Services
8
Iowa 80 Trucking Museum
Arts & Culture
9
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
10
Good Shepherd Corporation Iowa City Iowa

Good shepherd corporation provides high quality early childhood education for children 6 weeeks to 9 years of age

—
11
Des Moines Golf and Country Club Educational Foundation
—
12
Lee County Fair

To support agriculture education and development for youths in lee county, iowa.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Iowa Transition and Employment Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Build a Better Belmond. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
14/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RRMR SCHOOL DISTRICT: $212,121 · OtherRRMR SCHOOL DISTRICT+147 more: $1,382,390 · Other+147 moreTLC The Learning Center: $37,000 · Human ServicesOSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $16,055 · Human ServicesAVALON CENTER: $12,500 · Human ServicesAPPLE DAYCARE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesOne Vision: $68,565 · Housing & ShelterMASON CITY SOCCER CLUB: $26,654 · Recreation & SportsFLOYD COUNTY FAIR SOCIETY: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTH IOWA VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL GARDENS OF NORTH IOWA INC: $1,734 · Recreation & SportsMASON CITY FOUNDATION: $13,400 · EnvironmentBUILD A BETTER BELMOND: $5,000 · EnvironmentGROW ROCKFORD TOGETHER ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $8,589 · Food & NutritionWest Fork Food Pantry: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,594,511Human Services$73,055Housing & Shelter$68,565Recreation & Sports$43,388Environment$18,400Community Improvement$17,000Food & Nutrition$13,589

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne Vision: $68,565 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH IOWA YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $38,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTLC The Learning Center: $37,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetSTEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $21,500 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetOSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $16,055 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCUB CADET CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $14,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMASON CITY FOUNDATION: $13,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAVALON CENTER: $12,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFLOYD COUNTY FAIR SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $8,589 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC: $8,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL IOWA AG IN THE CLASSROOM: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAPPLE DAYCARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWest Fork Food Pantry: $5,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMOHAWK DANZERS: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCentral Springs Ag Ed Boosters Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCARING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL GARDENS OF NORTH IOWA INC: $1,734 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFLOYD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH IOWA CULTURAL CENTER & MUSEUM: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds One Vision ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds TLC The Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds MASON CITY SOCCER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds STEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds GROW ROCKFORD TOGETHER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OSAGE COMMUNITY DAYCARE ↗
  • Who funds CUB CADET CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MASON CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AVALON CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Citizens Bank Charitable FoundationIA40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc · Stratford Foundation · Tomson Family Foundation Trust · Blanche Carey Martin Charitable Tr · Foster & Evelyn Barkema Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beth E Reinhart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph