Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bess L Rayford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$255kArts & Culture$156kReligion$137kFood & Nutrition$121kCrime & Legal$117kEnvironment$80kEducation$43kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY$45,000
HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY$17,000
HENDERSON CIVIC THEATRE$10,000
RUSK COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION$6,000
RUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION$5,000
RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS$5,000
RUSK COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CEN$5,000
RUSK COUNTY UNITED WAY$5,000
ONE STEP AT A TIME INC$5,000
SPCA OF EAST TEXAS$5,000
HENDERSON FOOD BANK$5,000
RUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF TYLE: $4k → 12%WILEY COLLEGE: $5k → 16%TEXAS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $10k → 16%HENDERSON FOOD BANK: $5k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF TYLE: $2k → 12%TEXAS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $5k → 16%HENDERSON FOOD BANK: $5k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF TYLE: $2k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $45k → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $30k → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $30k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF TYLE: $2k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $30k → 17%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER OF TYLE: $2k → 12%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $27k → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS: $2k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1k → 12%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $25k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL: $15k → 17%HENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INC: $13k → 17%HENDERSON CIVIC THEATRE: $10k → 17%HENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INC: $10k → 17%KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL: $10k → 17%HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $5k → 17%HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $4k → 17%FRIENDS OF RUSK COUNTY MEMORIAL LIB: $3k → 17%RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $2k → 17%RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+71%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +10%
  • HF
    HENDERSON FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +46%
  • RC
    RUSK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • RC
    RUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +71%
  • WC
    Wiley College
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -21%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RUSK COUNTY MEMORIAL LIB
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Richland Wilkin Co

To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.

Animals
2
Henderson County Humane Society

Provide funds for animal care

—
3
Humane Society of Henderson County

Animal protection and control-provides care for more than 2400 animals each year, finds responsible, loving homes for 1500 annually and reunites more than 200 lost animals with their guardians every year.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Aransas County

Humane animal shelter

Animals
5
Henderson County Humane Society

To provide shelter for animals.

Animals
6
Rufus Refuge

Animal protection and welfare

Animals
7
Ritchie County Humane Society

Humane education:care of stray & unwanted dogs & cats: spay/neuter services serving a county population of over 10,000.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Richland County

Our mission is to advocate and compassionately care for the abandoned, abused, and neglected animals in our community, and to find them loving homes.

Animals
9
Helotes Humane Society

Rescue and place abandoned and unwanted pets. Provide low cost spay / neuter. Provide low-cost microchips. Provide community education.

Animals
10
Wilson County Adoption and Rescue Services

Provide a safe environment for stray, injured and abandoned animals in wilson county, texas until they can be adopted.

Animals
11
Ross County Humane Society Inc

The society runs an animal shelter that offers pet adoption, veterinary services, burials, etc.

Animals
12
Animal Support for Hendricks County

Animal shelter and animal rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henderson Interchurch Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Wiley College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $137,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHONE STEP AT A TIME: $62,000 · OtherONE STEP AT A TIMEIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION: $47,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATIONRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $35,500 · OtherRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDSRUSK COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION: $31,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSIONRUSK COUNTY UNITED WAY: $30,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY UNITED WAYHENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INC: $23,000 · OtherTHINK PAWS-ITIVE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Other+8 more: $59,000 · Other+8 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $255,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK…HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $65,500 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON IN…HENDERSON FOOD BANK: $55,000 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON FO…KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentHENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · EducationWiley College: $5,000 · EducationRUSK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalRUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$504,500Youth Development$255,000Food & Nutrition$120,500Environment$80,000Education$42,500Crime & Legal$30,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $255,000 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetKEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC: $80,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetHENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $65,500 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetHENDERSON FOOD BANK: $55,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetHENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetRUSK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetRUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC: $20,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHINK PAWS-ITIVE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetSPCA OF EAST TEXAS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHenderson Civic Theatre Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetRUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWiley College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSK COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSK COUNTY CHILD WELFARE BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THINK PAWS-ITIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Henderson Civic Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds Wiley College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henderson Memorial Hospital FoundationTX26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henderson Memorial Hospital Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation · United Way of Rusk County Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bess L Rayford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bess L Rayford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bess L Rayford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph