Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Henderson Memorial Hospital Foundation

THE FOUNDATION SUPPORTS THE LOCAL COMMUNITY OF HENDERSON TEXAS BY OFFERING SCHOLARSHIPS TO NURSING STUDENTS AND OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DONATIONS AND INVESTMENT INCOME.

$275k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$171kHuman Services$140kPhilanthropy$90kYouth Development$50kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$40kAnimals$38kEnvironment$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $259k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NINE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS$44,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA (RUSK COUNTY$20,000
UNITED WAY OF RUSK COUNTY$20,000
RUSK OCUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION$20,000
HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY$20,000
RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS$20,000
THE FRED R WALLACE HENDERSON KIWANIS FOUNDATION$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
HENDERSON CIVIC THEATER$10,000
RUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION$10,000
RUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE$10,000
HENDERSON FOOD PANTRY$10,000
KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL$10,000
HENDERSON HS HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM$10,000
CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 16%HENDERSON FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 17%HENDERSON FOOD BANK: $10k → 17%SON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY: $20k → 17%SON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY: $20k → 17%SON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES: $20k → 17%KIWANIS CLUB: $20k → 17%HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY: $20k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA (RUSK COUNTY: $20k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY: $10k → 17%RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $10k → 17%KIWANIS CLUB: $10k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA (RUSK COUNTY): $10k → 17%HENDERSON CIVIC CENTER: $10k → 17%HENDERSON HS HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM: $10k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA (RUSK COUNTY): $10k → 17%HENDERSON ISD HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM: $10k → 17%HENDERSON ISD HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM: $10k → 17%RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS: $10k → 17%CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY: $10k → 17%RUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE: $9k → 17%CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY: $8k → 17%CHRISTIAN WOMENS' JOB CORPS: $8k → 17%CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY: $4k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$476k · 15 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -3% since the first grant, against -74% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$476k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
-74%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RUSK COUNTY UNITED WAY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $60k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • RC
    RUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • TI
    TWELVE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCA
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • EI
    EIGHT INDIVIDUAL HIGHER EDUCATION S
    one grant, 2022 · $29k
  • SS
    SON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rusk Chamber of Commerce

The Rusk Chamber of Commerce is organized to advance the general welfare and prosperity of the Rusk area so that its citizens and all areas of its business community shall prosper.

2
Henderson County Humane Society

Provide funds for animal care

3
Community Care Food Pantry

Our mission is to eradicate food insecurity in our community by serving the people of Henderson County with hope and love.

Food & Nutrition
4
Rufus Refuge

Animal protection and welfare

Animals
5
Restoration Ministries of West Texas

Help needy have secure housing via home repairs.

6
Henderson County Homeless Coalition

Assistance with housing for homeless clients. This can include rent, utilities or deposits. We provided assistance for over 250 clients

Human Services
7
Harrison County United Way Inc

To provide financial support to human service agencies serving Harrison County, Texas.

8
Humane Society of Aransas County

Humane animal shelter

Animals
9
Hunt County Kids Inc

We are a one hundred percent volunteer organization working to help meet the needs of underprivileged children in Hunt County Texas.

Human Services
10
Humane Society of Henderson County

Animal protection and control-provides care for more than 2400 animals each year, finds responsible, loving homes for 1500 annually and reunites more than 200 lost animals with their guardians every year.

Animals
11
Russell County Food Pantry

Distribute food to the needy of the community throughout the year.

Food & Nutrition
12
Henderson County Homeless Ministry

Provide food and temporary shelter to the homeless.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henderson Interchurch Ministry and the most unlike its peers is Henderson Civic Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RUSK COUNTY UNITED WAY — $60,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY UNITED WAYRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDS — $50,000 · OtherRUSK COUNTY FRIENDS HELPING FRIENDSNINE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS — $44,000 · OtherNINE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPSSON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY — $40,000 · OtherSON SHINE LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRYTWELVE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCA — $34,600 · OtherTWELVE INDIVIDUALS FOR HIGHER EDUCAKIWANIS CLUB — $30,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUBEIGHT INDIVIDUAL HIGHER EDUCATION S — $28,955 · OtherEIGHT INDIVIDUAL HIGHER EDUCATION SRUSK COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · OtherRUSK OCUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION — $20,000 · OtherHENDERSON CIVIC CENTER INC — $20,000 · OtherHENDERSON ISD HEALTH SCIENCE PROGRAM — $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherSON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES — $20,000 · OtherHENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · Other+4 more — $43,000 · Other+4 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY — $20,000 · Food & NutritionHENDERSON FOOD BANK — $20,000 · Food & NutritionCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY — $29,260 · Civil RightsEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsRUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE — $38,405 · AnimalsKEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF RUSK COUNTY INC — $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$468,555Youth Development$50,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Civil Rights$39,260Animals$38,405Environment$30,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY — $50,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetRUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE — $38,405 over 4y, 16% of budgetKEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RUSK COUNTY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY — $29,260 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetHENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY — $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetHENDERSON FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHenderson Civic Theatre Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF RUSK COUNTY
  • Who funds RUSK COUNTY PETS ALIVE
  • Who funds KEEP HENDERSON BEAUTIFUL INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF RUSK COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS OF RUSK COUNTY
  • Who funds HENDERSON INTERCHURCH MINISTRY
  • Who funds SON SHINE LIGHT HOUSE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds HENDERSON FOOD BANK
  • Who funds HENDERSON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Henderson Civic Theatre Inc
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bess L Rayford FoundationTX26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bess L Rayford Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · John & Susan Landon Alford Foundation · United Way of Rusk County Inc · The Tj & Laverne Plunkett Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Henderson Memorial Hospital Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph