Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bernice Pickens Parsons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$63kHealth$56kHousing & Shelter$21kEducation$20kRecreation & Sports$14kArts & Culture$9kFood & Nutrition$8kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$503k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,500
RAVENSWOOD SENIOR CENTER$3,192
FAMILY REFUGE CENTER$2,500
DAYMARK INC$2,500
WV HEALTH RIGHT INC$2,500
WOMENS HEALTH CENTER$2,500
KANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC$2,500
PEAK LIVING SERVICES$1,500
RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS$1,500
RIPLEY SENIOR CLUB$1,100
BOMAR CLUB$1,000
JACKSON COUNTY READ ALOUD$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
SANDYVILLE SENIOR CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $3k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $500 → 19%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $3k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $300 → 19%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $2k → 18%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WV: $300 → 19%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $2k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $250 → 18%DAYMARK INC: $3k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $3k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $2k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $2k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $1k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $450 → 18%DAYMARK INC: $324 → 18%DAYMARK INC: $324 → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $2k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $270 → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $2k → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $1k → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $1k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $1k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $1k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 18%PEAK LIVING SERVICES: $2k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $810 → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 18%KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 18%KANAWHA PASOTRAL COUNSELING CENTER: $844 → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $405 → 18%RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS: $338 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$237k · 34 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
1

Total granted

$237k
$1k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KV
    KANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +131%
  • JC
    Jackson County Public Library Association
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • DI
    DAYMARK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANAWHA
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern Wv Felllowship Home Inc

The southern west virginia fellowship home is here to serve all in need of a better life apart from drugs and alcohol. we have a confident expectation that a whole new life "a better life" exists for all.

2
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

3
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
4
Life Resource Services of Jackson County

Our mission is to help those who are struggling with homelessness, by providing resources to help rebuild their lives.

Human Services
5
Wardwell Home for the Aging Inc
6
Rockbridge Recovery

Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.

Health
7
Home for Homeless Women
8
Anchor Homes Inc

Anchor homes operates a faith-based recovery program and believes in helping people of all races, nationality, social class, religion, gender, and language with recovery programming and housing. we believe that the answer to addiction is…

Health
9
Renewal House Inc

Renewal house is a not-for-profit corporation whose mission is to provide transitional housing for men and women 58 years of age or older who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. the organization also refers clients to needed…

Housing & Shelter
10
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
11
Crosskeys Human Services Inc

To provide independent living skills, increased self-esteem, and provide hot noon meals for two senior centers.

Human Services
12
Seasons Housing

Our slogan Its only a season, reflects the idea that recovery is not a lifelong struggle but a temporary process. Our goal is to provide the resources and support needed to help our residents navigate this season and come out stronger on…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peak Living Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ravenswood Senior Quilters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $30,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $17,840 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCWOMENS HEALTH CENTER — $16,560 · OtherWOMENS HEALTH CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $11,653 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRAVENSWOOD SENIOR CENTER — $10,884 · OtherRAVENSWOOD SENIOR CENTERWV ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION — $9,607 · OtherWV ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONJACKSON COUNTY SENIOR CLUB (RIPLEY) — $8,601 · OtherPILOT CLUB OF JACKSON COUNTY II ASSOCIATION — $8,485 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $6,493 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY FOSTER GRANDPARENTS — $6,485 · Other+17 more — $34,883 · Other+17 moreDAYMARK INC — $10,368 · Human ServicesDAYMARK INCKANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER INC — $10,356 · Human ServicesKANAWHA PASTORAL CO…FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $9,250 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTE…RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS — $8,553 · Human ServicesRAVENSWOOD SENIOR Q…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $2,248 · Human ServicesPEAK LIVING SERVICES INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesKANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $16,457 · HealthKANAWHA VAL…CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $5,095 · HealthCHILDRENS T…THE BOMAR CLUB INC — $3,800 · HealthTHE BOMAR C…Jackson County Public Library Association — $11,250 · Arts & Culture
Other$161,891Human Services$42,275Health$25,352Arts & Culture$11,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $17,840 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $16,457 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetJackson County Public Library Association — $11,250 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDAYMARK INC — $10,368 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER INC — $10,356 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC — $9,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS — $8,553 over 9y, 66% of budgetCHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $5,095 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOMAR CLUB INC — $3,800 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $2,248 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER — $1,148 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC
  • Who funds KANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC
  • Who funds Jackson County Public Library Association
  • Who funds DAYMARK INC
  • Who funds KANAWHA PASTORAL COUNSELING CENTER INC
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD SENIOR QUILTERS
  • Who funds CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC
  • Who funds THE BOMAR CLUB INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds MANNA MEAL INC
  • Who funds PEAK LIVING SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · HB Wehrle Foundation Stephen D Wehrle TTEE · Herscher Foundation Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bernice Pickens Parsons Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph