Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bernard & Nita Trugman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$91kInternational$79kReligion$47kEducation$19kCivil Rights$18kFood & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$4kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$900
Median grant
6
States reached
$546k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA$10,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$4,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE$4,000
JFEDLA$3,000
MAZON$2,400
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$2,400
NEW ISRAEL FUND$900
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$540
ALHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$360
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$360
NRDC$360
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $3k → 22%JFEDLA: $3k → 14%UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $10k → 14%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $3k → 8%S FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $13k → 11%CHILDRENS LITERACY INITIATIVE: $2k → 22%MAZON: $3k → 14%UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $5k → 14%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $3k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $10k → 11%CHILDRENS LITERACY INITIATIVE: $2k → 22%MAZON: $2k → 14%UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $3k → 14%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $2k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $10k → 11%REACH OUT READ: $3k → 16%CHILDRENS LITERACY INITIATIVE: $2k → 22%MAZON: $2k → 14%TRUE MENTORS HOBOKEN: $3k → 14%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $2k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $10k → 11%REACH OUT & READ NATIONAL CENTER: $2k → 16%UNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $3k → 14%HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY: $2k → 8%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $10k → 11%REACH OUT & READ NATIONAL CENTER: $2k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $9k → 11%REACH OUT & READ NATIONAL CENTER: $2k → 16%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $9k → 11%MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $9k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MA: $9k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $7k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $3k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $7k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $2k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $7k → 11%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $2k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE: $2k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $3k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $3k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $3k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 17 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$152k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+37%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HIAS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $15k · revenue +122%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +50%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    6× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • SF
    S FOR ALL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • RO
    REACH OUT READ
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • MF
    MusicLink Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
3
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
4
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
5
The American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…

International
6
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
11
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
12
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is MusicLink Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $88,088 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSAC…CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $24,321 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAELUNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKEN: $22,660 · OtherUNITED SYNAGOGUE OF HOBOKENMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $14,428 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunge…Individual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientS FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherJFEDLA: $3,000 · Other+6 more: $5,580 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $16,690 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE I…HIAS INC: $14,500 · InternationalHIAS INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $11,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID…International Rescue Committee INC: $10,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee …FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $9,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE F…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $7,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAY…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,490 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND+2 more: $2,254 · InternationalCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $10,000 · EducationREACH OUT AND READ INC: $7,500 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,260 · EducationMusicLink Foundation: $1,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $9,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $180 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,160 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,080 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $720 · Health
Philanthropy$88,088Other$80,489International$77,434Education$19,760Civil Rights$9,180Crime & Legal$5,160Health$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $88,088 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $16,690 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $14,428 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,490 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,160 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,790 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMusicLink Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $720 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC: $464 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MusicLink Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bernard & Nita Trugman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bernard & Nita Trugman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard & Nita Trugman’s filings →

More from the funding graph