Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benzien Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$720kArts & Culture$119kRecreation & Sports$56kYouth Development$42kAnimals$34kEnvironment$24kHealth$22kReligion$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUILFORD COLLEGE$39,500
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$35,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$7,500
LASALLE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$7,000
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO$7,000
ART SPAN SF CHILDREN'S ART PROGRAM$5,000
SOUTHEAST SNOWBOARD TEAM$5,000
SELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
MILO FOUNDATION$4,500
ST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC$3,000
SUNRISE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,500
WILMINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $35k → 15%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $8k → 19%EDUSKATE: $7k → 10%LASALLE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%SELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $12k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $40k → 16%BOOTHBAY REGION LAND TRUST: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%EDUSKATE: $7k → 10%CLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $40k → 16%BOOTHBAY REGION LAND TRUST: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%THE SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $7k → 10%CLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $40k → 16%BOOTHBAY REGION LAND TRUST: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%THE SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $7k → 10%THE SELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $39k → 16%BOOTHBAY REGION LAND TRUST: $6k → 9%THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $28k → 15%FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $7k → 10%SELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $38k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%THE DUNIWAY FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $37k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%SELLWOOD FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $31k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $23k → 16%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $23k → 16%SFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAM: $7k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $7k → 10%SFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAM: $7k → 10%ART SPAN: $6k → 10%SFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAMS: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%SFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAMS: $6k → 10%TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $7k → 15%SKATE LIKE A GIRL: $7k → 12%SKATE LIKE A GIRL: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
OR
CA
DE
AZ
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 28 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+18%

Still filing today

46%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +109%
  • TM
    THE MILO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $34k · revenue +97%
  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
  • LF
    LASALLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • AH
    A HOME AWAY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
2
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
5
Los Gatos Museum Association

Engaging community at the intersection of art, history and education through innovative, locally connected and globally relevant exhibits, programs and experiences.

—
6
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
7
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
8
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
9
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
11
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
12
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cleveland High School Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUILFORD COLLEGE: $308,000 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGEUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $233,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationCleveland High School Foundation: $29,000 · Education+2 more: $6,250 · EducationTUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $36,000 · OtherTUCSON PARKS FOUNDATIONTHE DUNIWAY FOUNDATION: $31,500 · OtherTHE DUNIWAY FOUNDATIONArtSpan: $30,000 · OtherArtSpanSFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAMS: $26,000 · OtherSFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAMSSELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $23,000 · OtherSELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATIONST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $21,500 · OtherST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINICDUNIWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $20,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST SNOWBOARD TEAM: $18,000 · OtherSELLWOOD FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherART SPAN SF CHILDREN'S ART PROGRAM: $15,000 · OtherNOGALES HIGH SCHOOL: $14,500 · OtherEDUSKATE: $14,000 · OtherSFMOMA'S EDUCATION PROGRAM: $14,000 · OtherSKATE LIKE A GIRL: $14,000 · OtherTHE SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $14,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $13,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Santa Cruz: $13,000 · Other+9 more: $52,250 · Other+9 moreCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $33,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MILO FOUNDATION: $33,500 · AnimalsBoothbay Region Land Trust: $24,000 · EnvironmentSNOW DAYS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DUNIWAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Education$576,250Other$387,250Arts & Culture$43,000Animals$33,500Environment$24,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Youth Development$2,000Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $308,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $233,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE MILO FOUNDATION: $33,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $33,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetArtSpan: $30,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCleveland High School Foundation: $29,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetBoothbay Region Land Trust: $24,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $21,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Santa Cruz: $13,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS RAISED: $3,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLE CHILD MONTESSORI CENTER INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSNOW DAYS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DUNIWAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MILO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds ArtSpan ↗
  • Who funds Cleveland High School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Boothbay Region Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S CHILDREN'S CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Santa Cruz ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS RAISED ↗
  • Who funds WHOLE CHILD MONTESSORI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SNOW DAYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE DUNIWAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benzien Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benzien Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benzien Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph