Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bennett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$372kCivil Rights$23kEnvironment$11kHealth$7kAnimals$5kPublic Benefit$2kArts & Culture$520Public Safety & Disaster$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$930k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU Foundation$20,000
NM Wild$1,000
Virginia Tech$1,000
Duke University$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Planned Parenthood$1,000
Carpinteria Education Foundation$500
Orange County Animal Shelter$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Upstate Forever$500
Citizens for Carpinteria Bluffs$500
Animal Protection Society of Durham$500
Climate Science Legal Defense Fund$500
Santa Fe Literary Festival$100
Hondo Volunteer Fire Dept$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%Climate Science Legal Defense Fund: $500 → 17%NM Wild: $1k → 14%Save the Saluda: $500 → 10%Upstate Forever: $1k → 15%South Carolina Public Radio: $320 → 16%Global Giving Ukraine: $250 → 14%Orange County Animal Services: $1k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $90k → 11%Orange County Animal Shelter: $1k → 13%Planned Parenthood: $1k → 12%Virginia Tech University: $1k → 21%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MAYORS FUND TO ADVANCE NYC: $250 → 17%NM Wild: $1k → 14%Save the Saluda: $500 → 10%Upstate Forever: $500 → 15%NPR SCETV RADIO: $300 → 16%NPR Network: $1k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $80k → 11%Orange County Animal Shelter: $500 → 13%Planned Parenthood: $1k → 12%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $1k → 21%Sierra Club Foundation: $1k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%UPSTATE FOREVER: $250 → 10%ETV ENDOWMENT: $300 → 15%Duke University: $60k → 11%Virginia Tech: $1k → 21%Planned Parenthood Federation of US: $1k → 17%UPSTATE FOREVER: $250 → 10%Duke University: $51k → 11%Virginia Tech: $1k → 21%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1k → 17%Duke University: $1k → 11%Virginia Tech: $1k → 21%Planned Parenthood: $1k → 17%Duke University: $1k → 11%VIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $1k → 21%ACLU Foundation: $20k → 17%Duke University: $80k → 11%Virginia Tech: $1k → 21%ACLU Foundation: $1k → 17%Animal Protection Society of Durham: $1k → 11%ACLU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM: $1k → 11%ACLU FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%Animal Protection Society of Durham: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
NM
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 15 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$413k
$6k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationCivil RightsAnimalsHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $363k · revenue +44%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +65%
  • THE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM
    3× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood Federation of US
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • OC
    Orange County Animal Services
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation Inc

The aclu of north carolina dares to create a more perfect union - beyond one person, party, or side. our mission is to realize this promise of the united states and north carolina constitutions for all and expand the reach of their…

—
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Southwestern Law School

For more than a century, southwestern has educated lawyers ready to serve clients, the profession, and our society with excellence. we empower students to reach their potential. we cultivate inclusion and belonging. we promote equity and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $363,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+2 more: $1,850 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 · Civil RightsVirginia Tech: $4,000 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherOrange County Animal Shelter: $1,500 · OtherCitizens for Carpinteria Bluffs: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood Federation of US: $1,000 · OtherOrange County Animal Services: $1,000 · Other+9 more: $2,070 · OtherSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $2,000 · EnvironmentUPSTATE FOREVER: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM: $2,500 · AnimalsROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $2,000 · HealthCLIMATE SCIENCE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $500 · Science & Tech
Education$364,850Civil Rights$23,000Other$21,070Environment$7,000Animals$2,500Health$2,000Science & Tech$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $363,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTATE FOREVER: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarpinteria Education Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $350 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF DURHAM ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds Carpinteria Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE SCIENCE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bennett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bennett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bennett Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bennett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bennett Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph