Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Benjamin F Johnston Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$375
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$12kAnimals$9kHuman Services$5kCivil Rights$4kReligion$4kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$1kHealth$611Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$375
Median grant
6
States reached
$116k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
C G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLAS$375
CARES FOUNDATION$375
AZ HUMANE SOCIETY$375
TEN LIVES CLUB$375
MSIA$375
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$375
LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT$375
Individual grant recipient$188
SHAWNEE MISSION EDUCATION FUND$187
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Naval Academy Parents Club of AZ: $637 → 11%MSIA: $400 → 14%TEN LIVES CLUB: $400 → 13%Shade Project: $565 → 10%MHMR of Tarrant County: $611 → 11%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $525 → 14%BOMA FOUNDATION: $625 → 14%Friends of the Aspen Animal Shelter: $637 → 6%CARES Foundation: $638 → 10%Friends of Naval Academy Music: $747 → 6%Naval Academy Parents Club of AZ: $625 → 11%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $515 → 14%BOMA FOUNDATION: $550 → 14%Aspen Animal Shelter: $625 → 6%CARES Foundation: $625 → 10%SAGAURO HIGH SCHOOL: $525 → 11%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $400 → 14%FIRENDS OF ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $625 → 6%CARES FOUNDATION: $625 → 10%SAGAURO HIGH SCHOOL: $515 → 11%FRIENDS OF ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $550 → 6%CARES Foundation: $610 → 10%AZ Humane Society: $638 → 11%FRIENDS OF ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $525 → 6%CARES FOUNDATION: $550 → 10%AZ Humane Society: $625 → 11%FRIENDS OF ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER: $515 → 6%CARES FOUNDATION: $525 → 10%AZ HUMANE SOCIETY: $625 → 11%CARES FOUNDATION: $515 → 10%AZ Humane Society: $565 → 11%CARES FOUNDATION: $400 → 10%AZ HUMANE SOCIETY: $550 → 11%AZ HUMANE SOCIETY: $525 → 11%AZ HUMANE SOCIETY: $515 → 11%AZ HUMANE SOCIETY: $400 → 11%Let's Be Better Humans Project: $637 → 11%LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT: $625 → 11%Let's Be Better Humans Project: $625 → 11%LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT: $550 → 11%LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT: $525 → 11%LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT: $515 → 11%LET'S BE BETTER HUMANS PROJECT: $400 → 11%Scottsdale Christian Academy: $638 → 11%SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $625 → 11%Scottsdale Christian Academy: $625 → 11%Scottsdale Christian Academy: $565 → 11%SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $550 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
KS
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 16 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$35k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+70%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    C G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLAS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +109% · 100% of their budget
  • SC
    SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +124%
  • Southern Methodist University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NAVAL ACADEMY MUSIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $747 · revenue +383%
  • FO
    FIRENDS OF ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $625
  • AA
    Aspen Animal Shelter
    one grant, 2018 · $625

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Smu Golf Foundation

Support men's and women's intercollegiate golf programs at SMU

Education
2
Society of American Military Engineers Foundation

To support the educational and scientific purposes of the society of american military engineers.

Science & Tech
3
Insead North America Inc Co Odonoghue & Lamb CPAs Pllc

Insead North America Inc, ("INA") employs U. S. resident professors to teach courses at Insead University in Paris, France, and INA conducts Executive Education programs to further support INSEAD's mission and development.

International
4
Institute of Musical Art

The mission of the institute of musical art (ima) is support of the juilliard school (juilliard), a 501(c)(3) exempt organization through annual distributions from the ima's endowment funds.

Arts & Culture
5
University of Santa Monica

The University of Santa Monica is dedicated to communicating the principles and practices of spiritual psychology worldwide through the process of soul-centered education.

Education
6
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Incorporated in 1952 as a non-profit organization, siam has worked toward the following goals for more than 70 years:-to advance the application of mathematics and computational science to engineering, industry, science, and society;-to…

Science & Tech
7
Shaw Institute

To discover and expose environmental threats to people and wildlife through innovative science and to engage in global partnerships to improve human and ecological health. the institute produces scientific research that drives change and…

Environment
8
Samford University

The mission of samford university is to nurture persons in their development of intellect, creativity, faith, and personhood. as a christian university, the community fosters academic, career, and ethical competency while encouraging…

Education
9
Foundation for Engineering At Kansas State University Inc

To support education missions of the ksu foundation and kansas state university by providing funding to the ksu carl r. ice college of engineering.

Education
10
Asu Enterprise Partners

See schedule oorganization's missionasu enterprise partners serves as the resource-raising arm of arizona state university. as the parent organization of five nonprofits that are each tasked with identifying new revenue opportunities, asu…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
The Stanford Daily Publishing Corp

The mission of the organization is to act as a major source of news relating to or of interest to the stanford university community and to provide an educational opportunity to stanford university students in journalistic writing,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shade Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARES Foundation — $4,863 · OtherCARES FoundationAZ Humane Society — $4,818 · OtherAZ Humane SocietyLet's Be Better Humans Project — $4,252 · OtherLet's Be Better Humans ProjectMOVEMENT-SPIRITUAL INNER AWARENESS — $2,215 · OtherMOVEMENT-SPIRITUAL INNER AWARENESSMovement of Spiritual Inner Awareness — $1,874 · OtherMovement of Spiritual Inner AwarenessNaval Academy Parents Club of AZ — $1,262 · OtherSAGAURO HIGH SCHOOL — $1,040 · Other+6 more — $3,589 · Other+6 moreC G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLAS — $4,252 · EducationC G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLA…SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $3,003 · EducationSCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEM…Southern Methodist University — $1,815 · EducationSouthern Methodist Universi…SHAWNEE MISSION EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $387 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,227 · AnimalsTEN LIVES CLUB INC — $775 · AnimalsBOMA FOUNDATION — $1,175 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF NAVAL ACADEMY MUSIC INC — $747 · Arts & CultureWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $611 · Human Services
Other$23,913Education$9,457Animals$3,002Community Improvement$1,175Arts & Culture$747Human Services$611

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetC G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLAS — $4,252 over 8y, 100% of budgetSCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $3,003 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,227 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $1,815 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOMA FOUNDATION — $1,175 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTEN LIVES CLUB INC — $775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NAVAL ACADEMY MUSIC INC — $747 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $611 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHADE PROJECT INC — $565 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $387 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds C G JUNG INSTITUTE OF DALLAS
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ASPEN ANIMAL SHELTER
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds BOMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TEN LIVES CLUB INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NAVAL ACADEMY MUSIC INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SHADE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SHAWNEE MISSION EDUCATION FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Benjamin F Johnston Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Benjamin F Johnston Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Benjamin F Johnston Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph