Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben F Harrison Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$317kHealth$269kArts & Culture$110kHuman Services$56kRecreation & Sports$38kAnimals$11kHousing & Shelter$10kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
$43,270
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Broward Center$76,100
Nova Southern University$67,500
Royal Dames of Cancer Research$43,270
Joe Dimaggion Childrens Hospital F$12,500
Alabama Sports Festival Foundation$10,000
Paws Humane Society Broward Co$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hope South Florida: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$956k · 10 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$956k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $172k · revenue +572%
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $125k · revenue +54%
  • LY
    LAUDERDALE YACHT CLUB INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $8k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • Nova Southeastern University Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $54k · revenue +37%
  • GT
    Grey Team Incgraduated
    2× · 2025–2026 · $10k · revenue +991%
  • AS
    ALABAMA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Greater Fort Lauderdale Chamber of Commerce

Founded in 1910, the greater fort lauderdale chamber of commerce is the oldest and largest business organization in broward county and it is apparent that throughout our history we have transitioned to better serve the business community.

—
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2025, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
6
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
8
Broward County Bar Association Inc

Maintain honor and dignity of the legal profession, regulate the practice of and promote improvement in the law and in the methods of its administration, educate its members and the general public in matters pertaining to the law and to…

—
9
University of Miami
—
10
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
11
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
12
Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc

The clinic for the rehabilitation of wildlife is a teaching hospital and visitor center dedicated to the saving of wildlife through state-of-the-art veterinary care, research, education, and conservation medicine.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Sports Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humane World for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Nova Southern University: $330,500 · OtherNova Southern UniversityBroward Center: $132,200 · OtherBroward CenterBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · OtherBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherAlabama Sports Festival Foundation: $30,000 · Other+10 more: $71,850 · Other+10 moreROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $171,870 · HealthROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH …CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATIONNova Southeastern University Inc: $53,600 · EducationHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 · Animals
Other$704,550Health$296,870Education$53,600Human Services$5,000Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $171,870 over 7y, 12% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $53,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLAUDERDALE YACHT CLUB INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWARD SHERIFF'S ADVISORY COUNCIL INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds Grey Team Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA SPORTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUDERDALE YACHT CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWARD SHERIFF'S ADVISORY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben F Harrison Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben F Harrison Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ben F Harrison Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ben F Harrison Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben F Harrison’s filings →

More from the funding graph