Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben & Jeanne Overman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$428kYouth Development$166kEducation$124kHealth$91kCrime & Legal$48kFood & Nutrition$19kPhilanthropy$19kPublic Benefit$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE ISRAEL$53,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$28,000
COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA$13,000
J STREET EDUCATION FUND$8,500
FIRST WITNESS CHILD ABUSE RESOURCE CENTE$5,000
CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER$5,000
CHUM$4,000
SIGGY'S MUSICAL GARDEN$4,000
DAMIANO CENTER SOUP KITCHEN$4,000
BERKWOOD SCHOOL$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$4,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$4,000
SAINT MARK AFRICAN METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
BRAVEHEARTS$3,500
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%BRAVEHEARTS: $4k → 6%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BRAVEHEARTS: $3k → 6%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
WV
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$951k · 32 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
5

Total granted

$951k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
0%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentReligionCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JS
    J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +61%
  • CU
    CHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +131%
  • FW
    FIRST WITNESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • HD
    HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • J
    JRCC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • UA
    Urban Adamah
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
4
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
5
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
12
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL INC: $274,900 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $160,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY: $31,500 · OtherWOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER: $26,000 · Other+21 more: $179,300 · Other+21 moreCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $78,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF …ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $10,500 · EducationST JOHN'S U…Berkwood School: $6,500 · EducationBerkwood Sc…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · EducationJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $53,400 · ReligionCHOCHMAT HALEV: $15,500 · ReligionFIRST WITNESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $27,000 · Crime & LegalUNCOMMON LAW: $21,250 · Crime & LegalANGEL FOUNDATION: $19,000 · HealthMILLER-DWAN FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARIES: $17,000 · HealthHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $4,000 · HealthLAKE SUPERIOR CENTER: $12,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Institute Inc: $11,025 · EnvironmentUrban Adamah: $1,125 · Environment23RD VETERAN: $17,000 · Public Benefit
Other$672,200Education$102,500Religion$68,900Crime & Legal$48,250Health$40,000Environment$24,150Public Benefit$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $78,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $53,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY: $31,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST WITNESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $27,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUNCOMMON LAW: $21,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetANGEL FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMILLER-DWAN FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARIES: $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget23RD VETERAN: $17,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCHOCHMAT HALEV: $15,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE SUPERIOR CENTER: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $11,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBerkwood School: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMENTOR NORTH: $5,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT SIERRA SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Adamah: $1,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST WITNESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNCOMMON LAW ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLER-DWAN FOUNDATION AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds 23RD VETERAN ↗
  • Who funds CHOCHMAT HALEV ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Berkwood School ↗
  • Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENTOR NORTH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT SIERRA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Urban Adamah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duluth-Superior Area Community FoundationMN23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Minnesota Power Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Northland Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pachel Foundation · Ordean Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Wildey Mitchell Family Foundation · Head of the Lakes United Way

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben & Jeanne Overman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben & Jeanne Overman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ben & Jeanne Overman Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Ben & Jeanne Overman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ben & Jeanne Overman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph