· Public charity
Belmont-Redwood Shores Public School Foundation
To help supplement the funds of the belmont-redwood shores school district so that programs can continue to be retained.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 99% of BELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $620k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES SCHOOL DISTRICT | $1,881,708 |
| RALSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL PTA | $166,740 |
| NESBIT SCHOOL PTA | $90,120 |
| SANDPIPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA | $82,380 |
| CIPRIANI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA | $72,970 |
| REDWOOD SHORES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA | $71,560 |
| CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA | $68,590 |
| FOX ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA | $67,400 |
| OPENING DOORS PTA | $13,117 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support elementary school education
The overall purpose of pta is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children
District School PTA supports all activities for students and staff at Redwood Shores Elementary School
To supp0rt the children in scho
The mission of the Parent Teacher Association is to positively impact the lives of all children and families by representing the members by empowering and supporting them with skills in advocacy, leadership and communication.
we are an organization at an Elementary school
PTA's mission is to make every childs potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
Parent Teacher Organization supporting academic programs and student enrichment events at school.
We are a not for profit public elementary school PTA that provides assemblies, field trips, teaching supplies, gardening and cooking programs.
To support elementary school with funds and resources
Parent Teacher Association providing Programming and Student enrichment support to Sutter Elementary School students. Support includes computer and science, music and art enrichment, assemblies, book fairs, STEAM initiatives, 5th grade…
PTA school organization
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students Inc and the most unlike its peers is California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS IN ↗
- Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC ↗
- Who funds SANDPIPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC ↗
- Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC aka Opening Doors a Belmont Redwood Shores Special Services PTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Belmont-Redwood Shores Public School Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.