Loading…
· Public charity
BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY
The foundation's mission is to provide support for charitable, educational and health based purposes both locally and internationally by raising and disbursing funds to those in need and providing funds and volunteer support for hands on projects.
$264k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
—
2021
purchase
2023
gen
2024
gen
2025
gen
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$22,804
Median grant
1
States reached
$854k
Total assets
Largest grants
- ATHLETES FOR KIDS$24,304
- KINDERING CENTER$22,804
- CONGREGATIONS FOR HOMELESS$12,500
- GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$8,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$274k · 4 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
13
Total granted
$274k
$251k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+92%
-2%
Still filing today
75%
38%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKTHE KINDERING CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +92%
- CFCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS3× · 2019–2024 · $66k · revenue +118%
- AFATHLETES FOR KIDS2× · 2023–2024 · $42k · revenue -20%
Funded once
- VVARIOUSone grant, 2021 · $60k
- IFISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BAone grant, 2018 · $40k
- RFRENEWAL FOOD BANKgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +121%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Nourish Pierce County
To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.
—
2
Feeding Washington
To expand food capacity in Washington state's Feeding America network.
Food & Nutrition
3
Washington Food Coalition
To strengthen hunger relief providers in Washington State
—
4
Port Angeles Food Bank
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
Food & Nutrition
5
Skagit Gleaners
Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served
—
6
Hunger Intervention Program
Hunger Intervention Program HIP seeks to increase food security for underserved populations in north King County
Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of Alaska
Food Bank of Alaska believes no one deserves to be hungry We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska
Food & Nutrition
8
Habitat for Humanity of Washington
The organization's mission is to seek to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. habitat for humanity of washington county (hfhwc) is a nonprofit, ecumenical christian…
—
9
Puyallup Food Bank
We are passionate about meeting the urgent needs of our neighbors and partnering to assist them, believing food is the first step on their journey to a more hopeful future!
Human Services
10
Feed Spokane
Secure available food for those in need. Creating an efficient sustainable partnership between food donors, meal providers and outreach workers.
Human Services
11
Renton Ecumenical Association of Churches
Reach provides a day and night program for individuals who lack resources to have their own home. also, reach provides hot meals to all comers. both programs served are available to all comers with some restrictions related to client…
Community Improvement
12
Eat Happy Now
Eat Happy's mission revolves around rescuing perfectly healthy food that would otherwise be discarded and ending up in landfills.
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Issaquah Food and Clothing Bank and the most unlike its peers is Corporation of Gonzaga University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$361,463Housing & Shelter$66,180Youth Development$42,344Human Services$36,395Education$18,716Health$7,920
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds ATHLETES FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ISSAQUAH FOOD & CLOTHING BANK ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE REACH ↗
- Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGAR ↗
- Who funds GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON AUTISM ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Medina Foundation · Bellevue Rotary Foundation · Aven Foundation · Kidvantage · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · United Way of King County · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation BELLEVUE BREAKFAST ROTARY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ATHLETES FOR KIDS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~20 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 810552451 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ATHLETES FOR KIDS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Bellevue Breakfast Rotary?
Find your warmest path to Bellevue Breakfast Rotary through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines