Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Becu Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$478k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$355k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$3.3MHuman Services$738kCommunity Improvement$719kEnvironment$610kHousing & Shelter$439kCrime & Legal$309kInternational$209kCivil Rights$209kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $123k
  • $250k+1 grant · $355k
$355,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION$355,000
WASHINGTON STATE OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP (WSOS)$123,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $958k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEIGHBORS TOGETHER INC: $10k → 12%BYRD BARR PLACE: $109k → 9%PARKVIEW SERVICES: $10k → 9%MI CENTRO: $10k → 9%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $109k → 12%BYRD BARR PLACE: $100k → 9%MI CENTRO: $5k → 9%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $100k → 12%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $15k → 12%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $109k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $100k → 9%ABUSED DEAF WOMENS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $10k → 9%MULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $109k → 9%MULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $100k → 9%COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB: $50k → 9%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Becu Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Becu Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 148 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

148 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 146 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

148
287

Total granted

$4.8M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+6%

Still filing today

10%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MULTI-SERVICE CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $209k · revenue +14%
  • SG
    Solid Ground Washington
    2× · 2022–2023 · $209k · revenue +10%
  • BB
    BYRD BARR PLACE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $209k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • WW
    WSOS Washington State Opportunity
    one grant, 2020 · $141k
  • NJ
    NORTHWEST JUSTICE PROJECT HOUSING
    one grant, 2023 · $109k
  • NJ
    Northwest Justice Project
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
2
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
3
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
4
Washingtonians for Public Banking

Washingtonians for Public banking promotes education and civic engagement on public banking and banking reform within Washington state. The organization organizes, educates, and advocates for the establishment of public banking, and…

Community Improvement
5
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
6
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—
7
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
8
Stewardship Partners

Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…

Environment
9
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
10
Futurewise

Futurewise works throughout Washington state to encourage healthy, equitable and opportunity-rich communities, and to protect our most valuable farmlands, forests and water resources through wise land use policies and practices.

Environment
11
Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund

The Washington Housing Alliance Action Fund elects candidates, educates voters and decision-makers, and amplifies the voices and priorities of people and communities most impacted by housing instability and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forterra Nw and the most unlike its peers is Parkview Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr14%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr14%6%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
3,845/29,531

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 435 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
16/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON STATE OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP (WSOS) — $1,028,500 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP (WSOS)WSOS Washington State Opportunity — $140,579 · OtherNORTHWEST JUSTICE PROJECT HOUSING — $109,375 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $99,961 · OtherEmerald Cities Collaborative Inc — $190,000 · OtherEmerald Cities Collaborative IncWASHINGTON WILD — $125,000 · Other+167 more — $1,175,679 · Other+167 moreSPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS — $224,375 · Human ServicesSPOKANE NEIGHBORH…MULTI-SERVICE CENTER — $209,375 · Human ServicesMULTI-SERVICE CEN…BYRD BARR PLACE — $209,375 · Human ServicesBYRD BARR PLACEEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $209,375 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA R…COMMUNITY CREDIT LAB — $50,000 · Human Services+5 more — $55,000 · Human Services+5 moreCollege Success Foundation — $707,500 · EducationCollege Succ…Refugee Artisan Initative — $250,000 · Community ImprovementRefugee Art…CENTER FOR INCLUSIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $190,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR …Seattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington — $109,236 · Community ImprovementSeattle Goo…NORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR — $60,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHWEST I…+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementRebuilding Together South Sound — $209,375 · Housing & ShelterRebuildin…Solid Ground Washington — $209,375 · Housing & ShelterSolid Gro…Ecothrive Housing — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterEcothrive…KING COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION — $209,375 · Crime & LegalNorthwest Justice Project — $100,000 · Crime & LegalHARBOR WILDWATCH — $90,000 · EnvironmentEarthGen Fka WA Green Schools — $90,000 · EnvironmentOUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND — $80,000 · EnvironmentOUR CLIMATE — $25,000 · Environment+2 more — $20,000 · Environment
Other$2,869,094Human Services$957,500Education$707,500Community Improvement$619,236Housing & Shelter$518,750Crime & Legal$309,375Environment$305,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCollege Success Foundation — $707,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRefugee Artisan Initative — $250,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS — $224,375 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMULTI-SERVICE CENTER — $209,375 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRebuilding Together South Sound — $209,375 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetKING COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION — $209,375 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $209,375 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBYRD BARR PLACE — $209,375 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA — $209,375 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR INCLUSIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $190,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetEmerald Cities Collaborative Inc — $190,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON WILD — $125,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington — $109,236 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetNorthwest Justice Project — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEcothrive Housing — $100,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetBLACK FARMERS COLLECTIVE — $90,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHARBOR WILDWATCH — $90,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetEarthGen Fka WA Green Schools — $90,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetOUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND — $80,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetBike Works Seattle — $80,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNORTHWEST INNOVATION RESOURCE CTR — $60,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY CREDIT LAB — $50,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetMI CENTRO — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERIM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKVIEW SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMINI MART CITY PARK — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetABUSED DEAF WOMEN'S ADVOCACY SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNeighbors Together Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFORTERRA NW — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTacoma Urban League — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Credit Unions in the …Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…The Satterberg Founda…United Way of King Co…Medina FoundationInatai FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hea…The Russell Family Fo…Lucky Seven FoundationWashington Federal Fo…
Credit Unions in the State of WashingtonWA48.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · The Russell Family Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Becu Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Becu Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Becu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 435 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home