· Private foundation
Bechily-Hodes Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $154k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEREZ ART MUSEUM MIAMI | $153,675 |
| LOCUST PROJECTS | $40,000 |
| WOMEN PHOTOGRAPHERS INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVE | $15,000 |
| SOUTH FLORIDA ART CENTER INC | $11,500 |
| FLORIDA GRAND OPERA | $11,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA | $10,000 |
| ARTES MIAMI INC | $8,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART NORTH MIAMI | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $5,000 |
| PHOENIX CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| BAKEHOUSE ART COMPLEX | $4,000 |
| NEW WORLD SYMPHONY | $3,000 |
| MIAMI CITY BALLET | $3,000 |
| POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF NORTH MIAMI INC | $2,500 |
| SAFE SCHOOLS SOUTH FLORIDA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JMJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $705k · revenue +174%
- LPLOCUST PROJECTS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +46%
- WPWOMEN PHOTOGRAPHERS INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- NMNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $75k
- GGIVEPACTone grant, 2023 · $10k
- MOMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +65%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The specific purpose of this corporation is to: expand knowledge and appreciation of modern and contemporary latin american tine art that has been created since world war ii; to operate a museum; to collect and display latin american…
Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.
The mission of the musuem of contemporary art is to contemporary art accesible to diverse audiences - especially underserved populations through the collection, preservation and exhibition of the best of contemporary art and its art…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
The mission of greater miami opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera. by expanding its reach to diverse communities throughout miami and fort lauderdale and wider audiences abroad creating a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Americas society is an educational forum which presents programs in its public policy and cultural affairs departments.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miami Freedom Project for Democracy and the most unlike its peers is Treatments for Epilepsy and Symptoms of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LOCUST PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN PHOTOGRAPHERS INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CARITAS CUBANA CORP ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF VISITORS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds ARTESMIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LAWYERS FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION ↗
- Who funds SAFE SCHOOLS SOUTH FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds The Police Athletic League Of North Miami In ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds BAKEHOUSE ART COMPLEX INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds AmericanWitness Inc ↗
- Who funds GAMMA PHI BETA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Alphawood Foundation · Walder Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bechily-Hodes Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Women Photographers International Archive Inc — 10% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Bakehouse Art Complex Inc — 2% of income from government
- Miami Music Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bechily-Hodes Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bechily-Hodes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.