· Private foundation
Beaty Martinez Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Arizona State University | $40,000 |
| The University of Arizona | $30,000 |
| KIDS CuddleKit Closet | $10,000 |
| Northern Arizona University | $10,000 |
| Locked In Elite Youth Foundation | $10,000 |
| Confidence Kits Inc | $5,300 |
| MentorKids USA | $5,000 |
| Saavi Services for the Blind | $5,000 |
| Southern Arizona Adaptive Sports | $5,000 |
| Smart Schools | $5,000 |
| House of Refuge Inc | $5,000 |
| Arizona Friends of Foster Children | $5,000 |
| Boys and Girls Clubs of the Valley | $5,000 |
| College Bound | $5,000 |
| Arizona Educational Foundation | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +99%
- AHArizona Humane Society4× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +38%
- ALARIZONA LATINO LEADERS IN EDUCATION2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- BCBourgade Catholic Schoolone grant, 2020 · $25k
- GCGrand Canyon Universityone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +19%
- BFBooks for Classroomsone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Friendly house, inc. is dedicated to empowering arizona communities through education and human services. established in 1920, the organization has evolved into a multi-service agency addressing the diverse needs of individuals and…
Genesis city's mission is to effect positive change in our community by empowering disadvantaged youth to acquire the education and work skills they need to become lifelong learners and productive members of their community in this and…
Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
To provide children with individual academic needs an education worthy of their potential.
Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
To help young people stay in school and to acquire the academic, personal, leadership, and vocational skills they will need to be successful upon graduation.
The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.
Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.
Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound and the most unlike its peers is College Bound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ON THE STREET INC ↗
- Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
- Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LATINO LEADERS IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS CuddleKit Closet Inc ↗
- Who funds Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Books for Classrooms ↗
- Who funds JOSIAHS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Homeless Youth Connection Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ARIZONA ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds College Bound ↗
- Who funds Saavi Services for the Blind ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds MentorKids USA ↗
- Who funds SMART SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds Threaded Together ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Thunderbirds Charities · William & Ruth Pendleton Memorial Fund US Bank National Association · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Sundt Foundation · American Express Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beaty Martinez Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Beaty Martinez Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Beaty Martinez Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.