Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bear Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$9kFood & Nutrition$6kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$3kEducation$3kEmployment$2kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tucson Museum of Art$1,200
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,000
US SQUASH$500
SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION$500
BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$500
CIELLO De AMOR$500
Planned Parenthood$300
Stoney Brook Southampton Hospital$250
Misericordi University$250
Grant High School Lacrosse$250
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$175
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CIELLO De AMOR: $500 → 15%CIELLO De AMOR: $500 → 15%Ciello De Amor: $500 → 15%CIELLO De AMOR: $500 → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $1k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23k · 13 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$23k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+13%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +33%
  • SO
    SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • CD
    CIELO DE AMOR
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD BANK So AZ
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • GL
    Greater Lawrence Family Health
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
9
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
10
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Als Foundation for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATION — $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATIONUS SQUASH — $2,000 · OtherUS SQUASHCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK So AZ — $2,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK So AZNATIONAL MS FOUNDATION — $1,750 · OtherNATIONAL MS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $1,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGreater Lawrence Family Health — $1,000 · OtherGreater Lawrence Family HealthALS FOUNDATION FOR LIFE — $1,000 · OtherALS FOUNDATION FOR LIFEPlanned Parenthood — $550 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATI — $500 · OtherWorld Wildlife Fund — $500 · Other+3 more — $600 · OtherBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureBRIDGEHAMPTON CHA…TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $1,700 · Arts & CultureTUCSON MUSEUM OF …Community Food Bank Inc — $4,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food…CIELO DE AMOR — $2,000 · Human ServicesCIELO DE AMO…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $1,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THE…SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthSHADES OF…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $375 · HealthMEMORIAL …THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $250 · HealthTHE SOUTH…SUMMER SEARCH — $1,500 · EmploymentCORE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $500 · EducationMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY — $250 · Education
Other$13,100Arts & Culture$4,700Food & Nutrition$4,000Human Services$3,500Health$2,625Employment$1,500Philanthropy$1,000Education$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC — $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCIELO DE AMOR — $2,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS FOUNDATION FOR LIFE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCORE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds BRIDGEHAMPTON CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATES INC
  • Who funds SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CIELO DE AMOR
  • Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH
  • Who funds ALS FOUNDATION FOR LIFE
  • Who funds CORE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bear Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph