Skip to content

· Private foundation

Be'Er Chadasha Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$730kPublic Benefit$175kArts & Culture$127kInternational$111kCivil Rights$75kEducation$30kHealth$23kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$56,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PERES CENTER$28,500
ISRAEL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOUNDA$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNITED WAY OF MIAMI-DADE$10,000
JEWISH INST FOR NATIONAL SECURITY A$10,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CENTRAL ISRAEL FUND$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVE AND MARY ALPER JCC: $1k → 15%DAVE AND MARY ALPER JCC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$514k · 15 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$514k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+21%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthCivil RightsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +59%
  • AF
    American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ
    2× · 2018–2019 · $22k · revenue +4%
  • BH
    Baptist Health Care Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AM
    ANU MUSEUM OF JEWISH PEOPLE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • GG
    GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
4
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
5
Jewish Year Abroad

To provide an education based program in israel for college age jewish young adults that will instill students with a sense of purpose, commitment & pride about

International
6
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
7
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
9
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
10
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Idi Foundation Inc Fka American Friends of the Israel Democ; the most unlike its peers is Health Information Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $645,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INCUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI INC+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEMO INS: $70,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISR…JEWISH INST FOR NATIONAL SECURITY A: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH INST FOR NATIONA…ISRAEL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOUNDA: $40,000 · OtherISRAEL DEMOCRATIC INSTI…Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PERES CENTER: $28,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PER…ANU MUSEUM OF JEWISH PEOPLE: $25,000 · OtherANU MUSEUM OF JEWISH PE…+11 more: $33,800 · Other+11 moreTHE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC: $125,000 · InternationalTHE IDI FOUNDAT…JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $30,000 · InternationalJEWISH INSTITUT…American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $22,000 · InternationalAmerican Friend…+1 more: $6,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBaptist Health Care Inc: $20,000 · HealthHEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC: $2,500 · HealthAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $6,500 · Civil RightsISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $3,600 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$727,000Other$277,300International$183,000Arts & Culture$100,000Health$22,500Civil Rights$6,500Public Safety & Disaster$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $645,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $100,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health Care Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARM HEARTS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDAVE & MARY ALPER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IDI FOUNDATION INC FKA AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEMOC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds WARM HEARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHET EILON INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVE & MARY ALPER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Be'Er Chadasha Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Be'Er Chadasha Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Baptist Health Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Be'Er Chadasha Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Be'Er Chadasha Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Be'Er Chadasha’s filings →

More from the funding graph