Skip to content

· Public charity

Bcsp Foundation Inc

Bcsp foundation, inc was founded with the mission of investing to create and grow a safer global community; protecting those they serve.

$960k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$461k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$933kEmployment$353kRecreation & Sports$273kPublic Safety & Disaster$136kHealth$41kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $136k
  • $250k+2 grants · $786k
$325,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION$461,282
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY PROFESSIONALS FOUNDATION$325,000
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL$136,282
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH LTD$27,799
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $30k → 16%SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 14%TEXAS A&M: $40k → 22%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 19%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $15k → 12%THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH LTD: $28k → 19%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $35k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WHITEWATER: $10k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 16%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 12%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $136k → 7%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY PROFESSIONALS FOUNDATION: $325k → 14%AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION: $461k → 6%SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $29k → 19%MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $15k → 16%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $10k → 12%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $20k → 14%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 19%MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $15k → 16%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $10k → 12%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $20k → 14%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 19%MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $17k → 14%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $15k → 14%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
IN
OH
PA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NC
OK
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$642k · 14 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$642k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+55%

Still filing today

29%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $950k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $92k · revenue +71%
  • EA
    EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $42k · revenue +69%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • US
    UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education
2
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
3
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
8
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
9
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Toledo Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Society of Safety Professionals Foundation: $325,000 · OtherAmerican Society of Safety Professionals FoundationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $122,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURITEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherMONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYINDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,226 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $35,000 · Other+17 more: $259,243 · Other+17 moreAMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION: $461,282 · EducationAMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATIONMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 · EducationMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $41,928 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC+3 more: $50,040 · Education+3 moreNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $136,282 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDU AND RESEARCH LTD: $27,799 · Employment
Other$946,469Education$645,250Public Safety & Disaster$136,282Employment$27,799

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Society of Safety Professionals Foundation: $325,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $136,282 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $92,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $41,928 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDU AND RESEARCH LTD: $27,799 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $20,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITOL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Society of Safety Professionals Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR CONSTRUCTION EDU AND RESEARCH LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITOL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Board of Certified Safety Professionals · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · West Virginia University Research Corporation · Yale University · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bcsp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bcsp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The National Center for Construction Edu and Research Ltd: 1% of income from government
  • Capitol Technology University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bcsp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bcsp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bcsp’s filings →

More from the funding graph