Skip to content
Bcg Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bcg Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$316k
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$2.1MHuman Services$365kPhilanthropy$319kEducation$172kHealth$71kInternational$42kFood & Nutrition$17kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k76 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $198k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG CHASDEI LEV$42,980
AGUDATH ISRAEL BAIS BINYOMIN$27,780
MERKAZ 302$25,000
FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC$22,575
TOMCHAI TORAH$15,000
SHOR YOSHUV INSTITUTE$12,402
OHR MEIR UBRACHA$11,250
CONGREGATION TORAS CHAIM$10,800
FRIENDS OF SEEACH SODE INC$10,042
CAMP HASC$10,000
PE'ER HATORAH$10,000
LACHMEI MORDCHAI$8,450
KHAL ZICHRON YAAKOV SHLOMO VCHAVA$8,415
YESHIVA TIFERES YISROEL$7,635
KIDS-N-CAMP FUND$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH OUTREACH SERVICES: $4k → 14%YOUTH OUTREACH SERVICES: $100 → 14%BAIS CHESED LA: $505 → 14%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 6%CHEVRA GEMACH INC: $362 → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKAH: $680 → 11%HASC CENTER INC: $50k → 20%HASC CENTER INC: $46k → 20%HASC CENTER INC: $39k → 20%HASC CENTER INC: $25k → 20%CHAI 4EVER: $100 → 11%HASC CENTER INC: $20k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $9k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $6k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $6k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $1k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $4k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $4k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $4k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $4k → 20%RELIEF RESOURCES: $2k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM INC: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%THE SIMCHAS MAYER FUND: $100 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $255 → 20%BRIDGES: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
AZ
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 71 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
87

Total granted

$2.6M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+10%

Still filing today

31%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HASC CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $180k · revenue +140%
  • TF
    THE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $170k · revenue +591%
  • TT
    TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET
    4× · 2019–2024 · $165k · revenue +182%

Funded once

  • FG
    FCF GEMACH 2020 LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • AI
    ALLEN I GROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +39%
  • CG
    CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
5
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
8
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
9
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
10
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
11
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
12
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cong Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sbh Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 213 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/68
Grantees still filing
39/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG CHASDEI LEV: $697,480 · OtherCONG CHASDEI LEVCONGREGATION CHERNOBIL INC: $259,420 · OtherCONGREGATION CHERNOBIL INCAGUDATH ISRAEL BAIS BINYOMIN: $110,369 · OtherFCF GEMACH 2020 LLC: $100,000 · OtherTHE HURWITZ FAMILY FUND: $72,000 · Other+148 more: $871,127 · Other+148 moreTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $170,275 · PhilanthropyTHE FLATBUSH CO…TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $165,000 · PhilanthropyTOMCHEI TORAH B…OHR MEIR UBRACHA: $79,850 · PhilanthropyOHR MEIR UBRACH…+6 more: $7,613 · PhilanthropyHASC CENTER INC: $180,420 · Human ServicesMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $21,860 · Human ServicesRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $16,200 · Human Services+9 more: $10,252 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED: $41,250 · ReligionTHE RANCH AT BETHEL INC: $30,500 · ReligionOHR NAAVA: $29,800 · ReligionIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $12,500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF SEEACH SODE INC: $10,042 · ReligionNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $10,018 · ReligionCAMP HASC INC: $10,000 · Religion+6 more: $6,100 · ReligionYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $87,995 · Education+5 more: $4,869 · EducationAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $40,000 · HealthKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $6,300 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,300 · HealthPILLARS PJS INC: $1,800 · Health+2 more: $860 · HealthTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $25,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,110,396Philanthropy$422,738Human Services$228,732Religion$150,210Education$92,864Health$51,260Crime & Legal$25,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHASC CENTER INC: $180,420 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $170,275 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $165,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $87,995 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $79,850 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED: $41,250 over 5y, 11% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $29,800 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $28,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $25,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALLEN I GROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $21,860 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Ateret Hatora Inc: $17,750 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $16,415 over 3y, 73% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES INC: $16,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIYUN HAPARSHA INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS-N-CAMP FUND INC: $11,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEEACH SODE INC: $10,042 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetNEFESH YEHUDIE INC: $10,018 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $6,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSBH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUTH OUTREACH SERVICES INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP DORA GOLDING: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH LINKS OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON MAYIR: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPILLARS PJS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Yedidim Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $1,680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKLAND INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER INC DBA BRIDGES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG CHASDEI YISROEL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY GIVING INC: $768 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS CHESED LA: $505 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVATH GESHER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED HELP & HOPE INC: $396 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HASC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds OHR MEIR UBRACHA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED ↗
  • Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR NAAVA ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN I GROSS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MY EXTENDED FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Yeshivat Ateret Hatora Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS-N-CAMP FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundAllen I Gross Charita…Jewish Communal FundZichron Chaim Charity…The Nathan and Marily…Alyad Foundation IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jsw FoundationEisenberg Family Foun…The Fishoff Family Fo…The Sorala FoundationAstar Foundation Inc
The Ojc FundNY71.7× affinity70 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jsw Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Astar Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bcg Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bcg Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 213 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bcg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home