Skip to content
Bayfront Port Charlotte Medical Staff Fund Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Bayfront Port Charlotte Medical Staff Fund Inc

Provide monthly meetings for its physician members via the executive medical staff held at bayfront hospital to consider educational programs for its members, committee reports, final approval of applcations, as well as any requests from charitable organizations for donations.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$110kHousing & Shelter$50kEducation$28kReligion$25kFood & Nutrition$15kInternational$10kArts & Culture$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$507k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Florida Medical Association$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Meals on Wheels of Charlotte county: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 3 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$105k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue -2%
  • SS
    SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR LOYADHAM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k
  • WH
    WORLD HARVEST MISSIONS OUTREACH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue -35%

Funded once

  • VB
    VIRGINIA B ANDES VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue -29%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +30%
  • TH
    The Homeless Coalition
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Massachusetts Emergency Medical Systems Corporation

Medical communications systems

Health
2
Medical Missions Foundation

To bring health workers, medical supplies and equipment to underserved areas of the world.

International
3
Community Memorial Hospital Association

Your neighbors caring for you.

Health
4
North Florida Medical Centers Inc

To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.

Health
5
Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc

Meals on wheels of central maryland's charitable mission, to keep homebound people living safely and independently at home through the provision of nutritious meals, personal contact and support services, reduces hospitalization, and…

Food & Nutrition
6
World Molecular Imaging Society

The world molecular imaging society (wmis) is an international scientific educational organization dedicated to the understanding of biology and medicine through multimodal in vivo imaging of cellular and molecular events involved in…

Health
7
Sri Lanka Medical Association North America Eastern Region Inc

Basic health care, to those who need it and can not afford it.

—
8
Manatee County Medical Society Inc

Manantee county medical society strives to guard and foster the mutual interest of its member physicians and to promote high quality health care for the patients of this community.

—
9
Community Outreach Medical Center

Comc is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive healthcare through an integrated care model. our mission is to improve the total well-being of individuals within the greater southern nevada region.

Health
10
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
11
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
12
Medical Association of Metropolitan Atlanta Inc

To champion our communitys well-being and safety while advocating a healthy environment in which physicians practice and serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels of Charlotte County Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $70,000 · OtherFLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INCCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $25,000 · OtherCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INCThe Homeless Coalition: $25,000 · OtherThe Homeless CoalitionANGELS CHARITIES INC: $4,500 · OtherNORTH PORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $4,500 · OtherVIRGINIA B ANDES VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $60,000 · HealthVIRGINIA B ANDES VOLUNTEER CO…American Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association In…SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR LOYADHAM: $25,000 · ReligionSHREE SWAMI…WORLD HARVEST MISSIONS OUTREACH INC: $10,000 · InternationalMilitary Heritage Museum Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$134,000Health$65,000Religion$25,000International$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA B ANDES VOLUNTEER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTER FOR ABUSE & RAPE EMERGENCIES OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD HARVEST MISSIONS OUTREACH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMilitary Heritage Museum Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH PORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNEW OPERATION COOPER STREET INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Charlotte Community F…Gulf Coast Community …Fawcett Memorial Hosp…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Charlotte Community Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · Fawcett Memorial Hospital Medical Staff Fund Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bayfront Port Charlotte Medical Staff Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bayfront Port Charlotte Medical Staff Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Military Heritage Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bayfront Port Charlotte Medical Staff’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home