Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bay Area Legal Aid

Baylegal provides free civil legal services to low-income residents of san francisco bay area to address legal barriers to housing, healthcare, personal safety, financial independence and stability so to escape poverty.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Crime & Legal$9.8MHousing & Shelter$5.1MHuman Services$2.1MHealth$197k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $183k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.6M
$183,094
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGAL ASSISTANCE TO THE ELDERLY$1,763,127
THE JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTER - HAP$1,374,917
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA$482,961
LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY$183,094
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY$39,795
WESTERN CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY$21,665
NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM$17,639
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO INC$13,104
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Environment: $27k → 10%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT EVIRONMENT: $12k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Environment: $12k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Environment: $12k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Environment: $11k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Environment: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 15 repeat orgs$625k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$17M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+270%

Still filing today

87%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $483k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    Legal Assistance to the Elderly
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.2M · revenue +555% · 49% of their budget
  • LA
    Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County
    8× · 2017–2024 · $314k · revenue +85%
  • Western Center on Law & Poverty Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $169k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOUSING AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS ADVOCATESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $113k · revenue +270%
  • CV
    Community Violence Solutionsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +101%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
2
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
3
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
4
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
5
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

6
Mental Health Advocacy Services Inc

The mission of Mental Health Advocacy Services (MHAS) is to protect and advance the legal rights of low-income adults and children with mental health disabilities and empower them to assert those rights in order to maximize their autonomy,…

Health
7
Sexual Violence Law Center

Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…

Human Services
8
Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County

As a public interest law firm, NLSLA changes lives and transforms communities. Through a combination of individual representation, high impact litigation, and public policy advocacy, NLSLA combats the immediate and long-lasting effects of…

9
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
10
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
11
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
12
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Justice and Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Cora Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Legal Assistance to the Elderly — $8,168,178 · Crime & LegalLegal Assistance to the ElderlyCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $482,961 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County — $314,485 · Crime & Legal+3 more — $443,219 · Crime & LegalTHE JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTER - HAP — $6,746,829 · OtherTHE JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTER - HAP+5 more — $485,005 · Other+5 moreNATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC — $167,195 · HealthCommunity Violence Solutions — $29,472 · HealthHOUSING AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS ADVOCATES — $112,500 · Civil RightsSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments — $98,270 · Human ServicesEDEN COUNCIL FOR HOPE AND OPPORTUNITY — $64,414 · Housing & ShelterTHE JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY CENTER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $27,715 · Public Safety & Disaster
Crime & Legal$9,408,843Other$7,231,834Health$196,667Civil Rights$112,500Human Services$98,270Housing & Shelter$64,414Public Safety & Disaster$27,715

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLegal Assistance to the Elderly — $8,168,178 over 8y, 49% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $482,961 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County — $314,485 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $231,505 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc — $169,214 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC — $167,195 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSING AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS ADVOCATES — $112,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $106,524 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $102,354 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments — $98,270 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS — $86,213 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPublic Interest Law Project — $42,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCommunity Violence Solutions — $29,472 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS — $28,273 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JUSTICE AND DIVERSITY CENTER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $27,715 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA23.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · California Access to Justice Commission · United Way of the Bay Area · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Munger Tolles & Olson Foundation · Pinpoint Foundation · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · Equal Justice Works · The Sobrato Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bay Area Legal Aid funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph