Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baumgardt Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$169kReligion$34kPhilanthropy$28kHealth$25kYouth Development$17kArts & Culture$16kEnvironment$12kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSE HULMAN INST OF TECHNOLOGY$60,000
GREATER HISTORIC TRADERS POINT$9,800
THE LEARNING ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$3,300
ADVENT EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,550
EPILEPSY FOUNDATION IOWA$1,500
FLANNER HOUSE$1,000
THE SOURCE$1,000
NSBA FOUNDATION$500
CHRIST CHURCH OF VERO BEACH$500
BOONE COUNTY RIDE TO LIFE$100
GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOG$100
IRONDOG K9 INTERNATIONAL$50
SEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS$50
DISABLED VETERNS NAT'L FOUNDATION$50
PROJECT K9 HERO$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%GUARDIAN ANGELS MED SERVICE DOGS: $200 → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MED SERVICE DOGS: $150 → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MED SERVICE DOGS: $150 → 16%GUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOG: $100 → 16%INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN: $500 → 12%INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN: $250 → 12%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$294k · 36 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
37

Total granted

$294k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+36%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +65%
  • BG
    BATTLE GROUND ACADEMY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • MB
    MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SR
    ST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +42%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT HEART CENTER CARDIOVASCU
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • NF
    NCGA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +213%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Indiana Veteran Initiative Inc

Partnering with veterans, their families, indiana employers, and communities to facilitate a meaningful transition to civilian life while strengthening indiana's economy.

Public Benefit
3
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—
4
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
5
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
6
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
7
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

—
12
Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc

Dogs Inc mission is to transform lives by creating and nurturing extraordinary partnerships between people and dogs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loving Paws Animal Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $135,000 · OtherRose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyPURDUE FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONCHRIST CHURCH VERO BEACH INC: $25,817 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH VERO BEACH INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER: $14,050 · OtherGREATER HISTORIC TRADERS POINT: $9,800 · Other+51 more: $66,995 · Other+51 moreBATTLE GROUND ACADEMY: $15,425 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationButler University: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $760 · EducationST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $500 · Health+2 more: $450 · HealthMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentINDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC: $4,203 · Human ServicesCHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC: $750 · Human ServicesGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC: $600 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureEITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 · AnimalsPROJECT K9 HERO: $250 · AnimalsCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 · AnimalsLOVING PAWS ANIMAL CENTER: $100 · Animals
Other$278,662Education$18,185Health$14,450Environment$12,000Human Services$5,703Arts & Culture$2,500Animals$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $135,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBATTLE GROUND ACADEMY: $15,425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC: $4,203 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INC: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetButler University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS MEDICAL SERVICE DOGS INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMorning Dove Therapeutic Riding Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS: $300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO: $250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIRONDOG K9 INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY-INDIANA CHAPTER OF THE PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVING PAWS ANIMAL CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSenior Resource Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BATTLE GROUND ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA MASONIC HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SNAFFLE BIT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Butler University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The Kahle Foundation Inc · James Ford Bell Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baumgardt Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baumgardt Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Baumgardt Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Baumgardt Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baumgardt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph