Skip to content
Bauervic-Paisley Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bauervic-Paisley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$9kEducation$8kHealth$6kYouth Development$5kArts & Culture$2kFood & Nutrition$1kHuman Services$1kRecreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISE AGAINST SUICIDE$2,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THERE WITH CARE: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23k · 4 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +195% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$23k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+36%

Still filing today

75%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EducationAnimalsCrime & LegalFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NORTHERN MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +85%
  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +697%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • BT
    BOULDER TREASURES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CO
    CHEBOYGAN OPERA HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • CC
    CHEBOYGAN COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cheboygan Trail Blazers Inc

Groom state of michigan snowmobile trails

Environment
2
Nbs Animal Rescue

To foster, love and adopt homeless dogs.

Animals
3
North Country Snowmobil Club Inc

Grooming and maintenance of snowmobile trails in the upper peninsula of Michigan. Volunteer run organization.

—
4
Wolverine Nordic Ski Club Inc

To provide recreational ski trail to area residents and to visitors to gogebic county, michigan. to provide cross country ski lessons and to hold other fitness conscious events during the year.

Recreation & Sports
5
Keweenaw Spay Neuter Assistance Group

Assist with paying cost for pet owners to have their pets spayed and neutered. provide shelter and vet care for stray cats.

Animals
6
Up Central Trails Inc

Snow Trail Grooming, State of Michigan

Recreation & Sports
7
MIchigan Pug Rescue

Rescue, Care and Placement of Pugs

Animals
8
Cheboygan Life Support Systems Inc

Cheboygan life support systems, inc. operates an ambulance service which serves the greater cheboygan county michigan area.

Health
9
Houghton Lake Trail Groomers

Maintain snowmobile and orv trails for public enjoyment

Recreation & Sports
10
Country K-9 Rescue Inc

Shelter for homeless animals

Animals
11
West Michigan Society for Protectio

Care and adoption of animals to educate the community in the importance of spay and neutering, to support efforts to shelter, feed and find homes for lost or abandoned cats and kittens, to establish a low cost spay and neuter clinic in…

—
12
Harbor Springs Snowmobile Club Inc

To promote winter recreation and maintain DNR designated recreational trails and facilities for use by the general public.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Michigan College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rise Against Suicide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHERN MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK INC: $8,500 · AnimalsNORTHERN MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCU…MCLAREN NORTHERN MI FOUNDATION: $4,500 · OtherMCLAREN NORTHERN MI FOUNDATIONBOULDER TREASURES FOUNDATION: $1,500 · OtherBOULDER TREASURES FOUNDATIONCHEBOYGAN OPERA HOUSE: $1,000 · OtherCHEBOYGAN OPERA HOUSEA A CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $500 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INC: $500 · OtherCHEBOYGAN AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · OtherCHEBOYGAN AREA ARTS COUNCIL INCINDIAN RIVER SNOWMOBILE GROOMING CLUB: $500 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationNORTH CENTRAL MICHI…HORIZONS K-8 SCHOOL INC: $500 · EducationHORIZONS K-8 SCHOOL…WELLSPRING: $4,500 · Crime & LegalWELLSPRINGRise Against Suicide: $2,000 · HealthCHEBOYGAN COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionTHERE WITH CARE: $1,000 · Human Services
Animals$8,500Other$9,500Education$5,500Crime & Legal$4,500Health$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE NETWORK INC: $8,500 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWELLSPRING: $4,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRise Against Suicide: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBOYGAN AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHORIZONS K-8 SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER SNOWMOBILE GROOMING CLUB: $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bauervic-Paisley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bauervic-Paisley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bauervic-Paisley Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bauervic-Paisley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bauervic-Paisley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home