Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bartsch Memorial Trust Xxxxx9004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$426k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Recreation & Sports$611kSocial Science$497kPublic Benefit$405kReligion$212kCrime & Legal$200kPhilanthropy$190kAnimals$175kEducation$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $161k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARKSTON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$111,200
CLARKSTON BASKETBALL FOUNDATION$50,000
R J SCHEFFEL MEMORIAL TOY PROJECT INC$40,000
OPTIMIST CLUB FOUNDATION$40,000
FRIENDS OF THE INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP$40,000
WARRIORS AT SAIL FOUNDATION$35,000
WARRIORS IN KAYAKS FOUNDATION$35,000
POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$25,000
DEWITT DISTRICT LIBRARY$25,000
CASA-THE VOICE FOR CLINTON COUNTYS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EDUCATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 16%EDUCATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 16 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$3.3M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
-2%

Still filing today

25%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic BenefitEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2018–2023 · $699k
  • OC
    OPTIMIST CLUB FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $497k
  • WA
    WARRIORS AT SAIL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $268k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $61k
  • OB
    Owosso Band Boosters
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -2% · 32% of their budget
  • LO
    LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue -96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clarkston Education Foundation

The purpose of the Clarkston Education Foundation is to enhance education in Clarkston Schools.

Education
2
Evans Scholars Foundation - Michigan

Educational.

Education
3
Oakland Jr Grizzlies Hockey Club
Recreation & Sports
4
Eaton Rapids Band Boosters Inc

Support Eaton Rapids Schools band progra

Education
5
Haslett Band Boosters

Support of Haslett Band Students

Education
6
Mid-Michigan Children's Museum

To provide a hands-on environment that engages children to use their curiosity and creativity while learning about the wonders of our world.

Arts & Culture
7
Oscoda Sports Boosters

To support educational youth sports programs in oscoda, michigan, by helping to provide team uniforms, equipment, supplies, transportation and other support for high school and middle school sports programs.

Education
8
Plymouth Canton Little League

Youth baseball and softball recreational league

9
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
10
Clinton Elementary Pto

Parent teachers organization

Education
11
Lapeer Lightning Music Boosters

Support Lapeer School Bands through fundraising and volunteerism.

Philanthropy
12
Clarkston Development Foundation

Clarkston Development Foundation, Inc., CDF Action, a not-for-profit created in 2010, uses an asset based community development approach, connecting and engaging the Clarkston community and surrounding areas by working alongside residents…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse of Oakland County and the most unlike its peers is Clarkston Basketball Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $698,568 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOPTIMIST CLUB FOUNDATION — $496,500 · OtherOPTIMIST CLUB FOUNDATIONWARRIORS AT SAIL FOUNDATION — $268,000 · OtherWARRIORS AT SAIL FOUNDATIONWARRIORS IN KAYAKS FOUNDATION — $268,000 · OtherWARRIORS IN KAYAKS FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF THE INDEPENDENCE — $235,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE INDEPENDENCECLARKSTON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $211,564 · OtherCLARKSTON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCASA-THE VOICE FOR CLINTON COUNTYS — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $145,000 · OtherDEWITT DISTRICT LIBRARY — $100,000 · Other+4 more — $256,000 · Other+4 moreR J SCHEFFEL MEMORIAL TOY PROJECT INC — $190,000 · PhilanthropyPOTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $175,000 · AnimalsTHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN — $100,000 · Public BenefitEDUCATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY — $11,006 · Human ServicesOwosso Band Boosters — $25,000 · Education
Other$2,828,632Philanthropy$190,000Animals$175,000Public Benefit$100,000Human Services$61,006Education$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetR J SCHEFFEL MEMORIAL TOY PROJECT INC — $190,000 over 7y, 55% of budgetPOTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $175,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN — $100,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetEDUCATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOwosso Band Boosters — $25,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY — $11,006 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds R J SCHEFFEL MEMORIAL TOY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN
  • Who funds CLARKSTON BASKETBALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTER
  • Who funds Owosso Band Boosters
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bartsch Memorial Trust Xxxxx9004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph