Skip to content
Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education at a glance

· Private foundation

Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.9MReligion$174kYouth Development$56kScience & Tech$39kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$17,743
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE$17,743
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CANEY VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 14%YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE: $1.2M → 14%CANEY VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 14%ROGERS STATE FOUNDATION: $175k → 14%SPIRIT CHURCH: $87k → 14%CONCERN: $174k → 14%GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $87k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $45k → 14%TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $25k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $40k → 14%TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY - STEM CAMPS: $15k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $40k → 14%TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $14k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $40k → 14%PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE: $12k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $40k → 14%PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE: $9k → 14%LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $40k → 14%PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE: $9k → 14%YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE: $40k → 14%TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY-SCHOLARSHIPS: $5k → 14%YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE: $18k → 14%BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 14%TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY-SCHOLARSHIPS: $5k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 14%OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%JANE PHILLIPS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%WESTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%THE COTTAGE: $2k → 14%THE COTTAGE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$600k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$1.8M
$600k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+55%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.3M · revenue -92% · 76% of their budget
  • LF
    LOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $245k
  • BE
    BARTLESVILLE EDUCATION PROMISE-STEM LEADERSHIP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k

Funded once

  • RS
    ROGERS STATE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $175k
  • C
    CONCERN
    one grant, 2024 · $174k
  • GC
    GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $87k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $1,260,797 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INCLOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARS: $245,000 · OtherLOWE FAMILY YOUNG SCHOLARSROGERS STATE FOUNDATION: $174,600 · OtherROGERS STATE FOUNDATIONCONCERN: $174,000 · OtherCONCERNGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $87,000 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHSPIRIT CHURCH: $87,000 · OtherSPIRIT CHURCHBARTLESVILLE EDUCATION PROMISE-STEM LEADERSHIP: $46,000 · OtherROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY: $44,900 · OtherTRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $39,000 · Other+16 more: $160,475 · Other+16 morePATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $30,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Youth Development$1,260,797Other$1,057,975Education$45,500Philanthropy$15,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $1,260,797 over 2y, 76% of budgetPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL SUPPLY DRIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lyon FoundationBartlesville Communit…Jeanalee and Charles …Arvest FoundationK S Adams Foundation …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Lyon FoundationOK22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · Bartlesville Community Foundation · Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation · Arvest Foundation · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education?

    Find your warmest path to Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home