Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barry Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.4MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$281kReligion$80kHousing & Shelter$35kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$43,000
BAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$5,000
JARC FLORIDA$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
FD FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $18k → 13%JARC Foundation: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 4 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +141% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$2.8M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+141%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.4M · revenue +252%
  • RN
    RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $258k · revenue +141%
  • JA
    JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • MD
    MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL OF BOCA RATON
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - NYC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jarc Florida Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to jewish association for residential care, inc.

Health
3
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
6
Jewish Association for Developmental Disabilities Inc

To provide kosher, nonsectarian living arrangements for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

Human Services
7
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
8
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
9
Jewish Home and Rehabilitation Center

To obtain funds and property by gift and apply the income and principal thereof, either directly or through contributions to jewish home and rehabilitation center, home at rockleigh, jewish home assisted living, and the jewish home family,…

Health
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc

The organization's mission is to care for abused, neglected and at-risk children as well as those with developmental disabilities in the jewish community and to work in partnership with families and the entire community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,375,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM+2 more: $15,000 · InternationalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,174,100 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation IncRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $258,000 · HealthRUTH & NO…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthMAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL OF BOCA RATON: $25,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE - NYC: $20,000 · OtherRonald McDonald House: $5,000 · OtherHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $5,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $4,160 · OtherJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE JARC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Education
International$1,390,000Community Improvement$1,174,100Health$263,000Other$114,160Human Services$23,000Philanthropy$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,375,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $1,174,100 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $258,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JARC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barry Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barry Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph