Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barnum May (Dec D)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$848kHealth$773kEducation$3k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $250
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
$77,722
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES$152,294
SHRINERS HOSPITAL CHILDREN TRUST$77,722
BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $250 → 16%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $250 → 11%BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $250 → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $152k → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $250 → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $250 → 14%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 20%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $86k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $82k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $76k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $75k → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $84k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $250 → 12%TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $144k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

33%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $848k · revenue +45%
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2017–2021 · $393k · revenue -14%
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITAL CHILDREN TRUST
    2× · 2023–2025 · $222k

Funded once

  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $84k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS
    one grant, 2022 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Seattle University

Seattle University, an institution of higher education, is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
3
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
4
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate (continued in schedule o)students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous…

Education
5
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and (cont. on sch. o) biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
6
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Pacific University

A diverse sustainable community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship, and practice, pacific inspires students to think, care, and pursue justice in our world

Education
9
California Lutheran University

Clu is an institution offering undergraduate and graduate degrees in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
10
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
11
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars. recognized as one of the top regional colleges and…

Education
12
Lehigh University

Lehigh university strives to earn international prominence as a universty of special distinction and provide students with opportunities for success through its integration of teaching, research and service to society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Oregon University Development Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Trillium Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $847,947 · Housing & ShelterTRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICESTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $393,112 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILD…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $74,572 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENSHRINERS HOSPITAL CHILDREN TRUST: $221,841 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL CHI…SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN TRUST: $83,850 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR…+6 more: $2,250 · OtherLinfield University: $250 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $250 · Education
Housing & Shelter$847,947Health$467,684Other$307,941Education$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $847,947 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $393,112 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $74,572 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnum May (Dec D) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnum May (Dec D). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Warner Pacific University: 14% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Corban University: 3% of income from government
  • Trillium Family Services: 2% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnum May (Dec D)’s filings →

More from the funding graph