Skip to content

· Public charity

Barnraisers Inc

Mission is to care for and support orphaned and underprivileged youth.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$178kEducation$100kHuman Services$95kRecreation & Sports$54kReligion$24kCrime & Legal$15kHousing & Shelter$10kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $145,425, the rows itemized in this filing. The $165,373 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,948 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$50,000
INDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC$50,000
BEN'S RANCH$20,000
ZOEY'S PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
FAMILY HOPE INC$10,000
REINS TO RECOVERY$5,425
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ZOEY'S PLACE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 5%REINS TO RECOVERY: $5k → 12%SAME AS U INC: $17k → 5%INDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
2
Indiana Family to Family

Indiana family to family (inf2f) is a unique statewide family-led organization that provides information, training, and peer support to caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs (cyshcn) and the professionals who…

—
3
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
4
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
5
Communities in Schools Indiana

Surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Youth Development
6
New Hope of Indiana Inc

New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.

—
7
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
8
The Peers Project of Indiana Inc

The peers project creates an influence network that empowers teens to choose healthy behaviors and form positive relationships.

—
9
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
10
Kipp Indianapolis Inc

KIPP Indy is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools. KIPP Indy's mission is to create a network of schools that provides educationally underserved children with a rigorous education that…

Education
11
Indiana Youth Institute Inc

Our mission is to improve the lives of all indiana children by strengthening and connecting the people, organizations, and communities focused on kids and youth.

Human Services
12
Modern Mental Health Inc

We are committed to providing and expanding quality mental health services to the local community. We are also committed to training the next generation of therapists and provide supervision for students completing their required…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Theraplay Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Generation Patient Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEUROHOPE OF INDIANA INC: $80,000 · HealthNEUROHOPE OF INDIANA INCTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INCBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $20,000 · HealthBrooke's Place for Grieving Young Peopl…BEN'S RANCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthBEN'S RANCH FOUNDATION INCGeneration Patient Inc: $15,000 · HealthGeneration Patient IncROUNDTRIPPERS FOUNDATION INC: $54,000 · OtherROUNDTRIPPERS FOUNDATI…HORIZON CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $17,000 · OtherHORIZON CHRISTIAN FELL…THE CHRIS CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE CHRIS CENTER INCINDIANA HANDS & VOICES CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherINDIANA HANDS & VOICES…Youth For Christ Inc: $7,000 · OtherYouth For Christ IncINDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesINDIANA BLIND CHILDRE…SAME AS U INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesSAME AS U INCREINS TO RECOVERY INC: $15,425 · Human ServicesREINS TO RECOVERY INCFAMILY HOPE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY HOPE INCINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationINDIANAPOLIS PUBL…HERRON HIGH SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · EducationHERRON HIGH SCHOO…STUDENT IMPACT OF WESTFIELD INC: $25,000 · ReligionThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterVILLAGE COOPERATIVE INC: $10,000 · International
Health$171,000Other$98,000Human Services$92,425Education$75,000Religion$25,000Youth Development$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEUROHOPE OF INDIANA INC: $80,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHERRON HIGH SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT IMPACT OF WESTFIELD INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBEN'S RANCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSAME AS U INC: $17,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetREINS TO RECOVERY INC: $15,425 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGeneration Patient Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLAGE COOPERATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CHRIS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetFAMILY HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYouth For Christ Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN29.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Healthcare Initiatives Inc · Joined for Good Inc Dba Brackets for Good · Hoover Family Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnraisers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnraisers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barnraisers Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Barnraisers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barnraisers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph