Skip to content
Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the peninsula, marin and sonoma counties.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$358k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

International$1.6MPhilanthropy$700kHuman Services$320kFood & Nutrition$200kEnvironment$200kReligion$172kHealth$165kArts & Culture$145kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k19 grants · $493k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $694k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITCHON LEV INC$357,953
FRIENDS OF IRGUN NECHEI ZAHAL$336,363
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$214,772
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE AKA HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$100,000
ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE DBA STAND WITH US$100,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC (JDC)$80,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$75,000
NETANYA FOUNDATION$71,591
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM - ANCHORAGE$71,590
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC$60,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$60,000
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC (JFNA)$50,000
BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC$50,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $470k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOCIAL FINANCE ISRAEL: $30k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF IDF WIDOWS AND ORPHANS ORGANIZATION: $25k → 9%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $215k → 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $75k → 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%EXCEL ALASKA INC: $25k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $25k → 10%CHILDCARE CONNECTIONS DBA THREAD: $25k → 10%CHILDCARE CONNECTIONS DBA THREAD: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 12% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 9%.

Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 15 repeat orgs$577k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$2.4M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

87%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $332k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Catholic Social Services
    3× · 2022–2025 · $315k · revenue +70%
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $140k · revenue +58%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    3× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
    one grant, 2024 · $96k
  • AL
    ANCHORAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $49k · revenue +32%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
2
Israel Venture Network

The Organization is at the forefront of the social business arena for fourth sector in Israel, nurturing and growing this emerging sector and generating sustainable social impact by providing Israel's social businesses with knowledge,…

Education
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
5
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
6
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
7
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
8
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
10
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
11
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
12
Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council

The jewish agency for israel - north american council (the organization"), was organized to work with and in support of nonprofit organizations in israel active in the fields of aliyah (immigration) and absorption; service to vulnerable…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Boys Town Jerusalem Foundation of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pitchon Lev Inc: $507,953 · InternationalPitchon Lev IncFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $386,363 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INCISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $150,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $110,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $80,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution …Junior Achievement of Alaska Inc: $75,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Alaska IncPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $435,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS I…JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $225,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION …THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $155,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NO…BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $85,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATI…+3 more: $65,000 · Philanthropy+3 moreISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $140,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEAR…THE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC: $96,591 · OtherTHE NETANYA FOUNDATI…CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM: $96,590 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SH…UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA: $95,792 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALASKACONGREGATION OR HATZAFON: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OR HATZ…ANCHORAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $49,168 · OtherANCHORAGE LIBRARY FO…TEEN RELIEF MISSIONS INC: $25,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25,000 · OtherALASKA JEWISH CAMPUS: $25,000 · OtherSTAR INC: $25,000 · OtherSouthcentral Foundation: $25,000 · OtherAlaska Legal Services Corporation: $25,000 · OtherCatholic Social Services: $314,772 · Human ServicesCatholic Socia…Child Care Connection Inc DBA Thread: $50,000 · Human ServicesChild Care Con…COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $40,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE…Social Finance Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesSocial Finance…American Friends of IDF Widows and Orphans Organization Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesEXCEL ALASKA INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $200,000 · ReligionIsrael 21c: $76,000 · EducationFood Bank of Alaska: $75,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$1,309,316Philanthropy$965,000Other$678,141Human Services$484,772Religion$200,000Education$76,000Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPitchon Lev Inc: $507,953 over 3y, 18% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $435,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $386,363 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Social Services: $314,772 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $225,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $155,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC: $96,591 over 1y, 42% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $85,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIsrael 21c: $76,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetJunior Achievement of Alaska Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChild Care Connection Inc DBA Thread: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANCHORAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $49,168 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthcentral Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEL ALASKA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAlaska Legal Services Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTAR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationThe Alaska Community …The Carr Foundation I…Valley Hospital Assoc…Gottstein Family Foun…United Way of Anchora…Alaska Children's Tru…Alaska Native Tribal …Providence Health & S…Ima FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…Jewish Community Fede…
Rasmuson FoundationAK29.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · The Carr Foundation Inc · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Gottstein Family Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Alaska Children's Trust · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Ima Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Social Finance Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barney and Rachel Gottstein Caritable’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home