Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$116kEducation$24kArts & Culture$18kReligion$6kPublic Benefit$4kCrime & Legal$3kHuman Services$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$2,300
SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE$2,000
OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE$2,000
ARIZONA MUSICFEST$1,000
TULSA BOTANIC GARDEN$200
PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $250 → 7%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $100 → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 14 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
42

Total granted

$167k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+45%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +23%
  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +253%
  • AM
    ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOSTON AVENUE UNITED METHODIST CHUR
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
2
Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
6
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
7
Oklahoma Bar Foundation

The oklahoma bar foundation provides annual funding through grants to promote the advancement of justice, to provide critical civil legal services to those in need, and to increase public awareness and understanding of the american legal…

Crime & Legal
8
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
9
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
10
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
11
Friends of the Oklahoma History Center

To provide broad-based advisory, planning, and financial support for the various exhibits, projects, education programs, and initiatives undertaken by the Oklahoma Historical Society.

Arts & Culture
12
The University of Tulsa

The university of tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Pinnacle Peak Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA BOTANIC GARDEN: $115,700 · OtherTULSA BOTANIC GARDENIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $7,000 · Other+39 more: $29,683 · Other+39 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,940 · EducationTulsa Library Trust: $500 · Education+2 more: $200 · EducationTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $6,100 · Arts & CultureARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $3,000 · Community ImprovementSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $1,200 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyGREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC: $250 · Human ServicesMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $250 · Human ServicesFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $100 · Human ServicesLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $300 · Crime & Legal
Other$163,383Education$11,640Arts & Culture$8,200Community Improvement$3,000Philanthropy$1,300Human Services$600Crime & Legal$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,940 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $6,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA MUSICFEST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF TRIAL LAWYERS: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Library Trust: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PINNACLE PEAK PARK: $300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA MUSICFEST INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TRIAL LAWYERS ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Library Trust ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PINNACLE PEAK PARK ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

One Gas Foundation IncOK26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: One Gas Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · John and Donnie Brock Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Bethune-Cookman University: 6% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr?

Find your warmest path to Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barbara & James Sturdivant Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph