Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bamberger Allen Health & Education Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$237k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$1.4MHuman Services$223kHealth$73kArts & Culture$60kAnimals$39kInternational$30kEducation$27kCommunity Improvement$8kEnvironment$5kOther$808k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $204k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS CENTER$45,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$25,000
THE CHRISTMAS BOX HOUSE$25,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$20,000
BALLET WEST$17,000
FOURTH STREET CLINIC$15,000
PEACE HOUSE INC$15,000
THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN SCHOOL$12,000
UTAH SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF BLIND$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH$10,000
HOPE ALLIANCE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
HOLLADAY PRESCHOOL$7,000
RON MCBRIDE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%PEACE HOUSE INC: $15k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $10k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $7k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $6k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $6k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $5k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $5k → 5%PEACE HOUSE INC: $5k → 5%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $6k → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $6k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $52k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $17k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $15k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $14k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 32 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+56%

Still filing today

53%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +199%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    5× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +93%
  • PH
    Peace House Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • DW
    DAVID W BERNOLFO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.3M · revenue -16% · 42% of their budget
  • WC
    WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +128%
  • TJ
    THE JACKSON BYCK MEMORIAL SCHOLARSH
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
2
Utah Geological Foundation
3
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
4
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

5
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
6
Utah Donor Collaborative

Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

7
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
9
Utah Regional Housing Corporation

Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.

Housing & Shelter
10
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

11
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
12
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orange Couch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Youth Sports LeaguesChild & Family Support Serv…Utah Environmental Conserva…Vulnerable Populations Supp…Healthcare Access & Innovat…Performing Arts Organizatio…Charter Schools K-9Food Security & Hunger Reli…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%4%<5yr15%8%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr16%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%61%<5yr15%1%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr9%4%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 61% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
15%
766/5,124

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
23/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAVID W BERNOLFO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,338,354 · PhilanthropyDAVID W BERNOLFO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $14,125 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH — $128,800 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAHUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $87,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHHUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE — $69,400 · OtherHUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTEUTAH FOOD BANK — $65,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient — $51,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHRISTMAS BOX HOUSE — $44,225 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $42,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC — $41,725 · OtherHOLLADAY PRESCHOOL — $40,425 · OtherMORAN EYE CENTER — $35,000 · Other+22 more — $241,925 · Other+22 moreNeighborhood House Association — $142,100 · Human ServicesNeighborh…Peace House Inc — $59,000 · Human ServicesPeace Hou…THE ROAD HOME — $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD …+1 more — $5,500 · Human ServicesWasatch Homeless Health Care — $54,575 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $18,500 · HealthBALLET WEST — $44,500 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY GATEWAY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $8,225 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTER — $7,500 · Arts & CultureHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH — $24,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $15,000 · AnimalsInternational Rescue Committee INC — $22,225 · InternationalTHE HOPE ALLIANCE — $8,000 · International
Philanthropy$1,352,479Other$847,500Human Services$222,600Health$73,075Arts & Culture$60,225Animals$39,000International$30,225

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDAVID W BERNOLFO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,338,354 over 1y, 42% of budgetNeighborhood House Association — $142,100 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH — $128,800 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc — $59,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care — $54,575 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET WEST — $44,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC — $41,725 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LOWELL WHITEMAN SCHOOL — $28,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH — $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $22,225 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL — $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $18,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRON MCBRIDE FOUNDATION INC — $14,125 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDISCOVERY GATEWAY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $8,225 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOPE ALLIANCE — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER — $5,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUtah Kids Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUCH FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAVID W BERNOLFO MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Peace House Inc
  • Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care
  • Who funds BALLET WEST
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC
  • Who funds THE LOWELL WHITEMAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds RON MCBRIDE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DISCOVERY GATEWAY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
  • Who funds THE HOPE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS
  • Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC
  • Who funds UTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER
  • Who funds Utah Kids Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · McCarthey Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Franks Family Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · King Family Foundation · The Huntsman Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bamberger Allen Health & Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bamberger Allen Health & Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bamberger Allen Health & Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph